Coming up short, the home of Sarah Ferguson and Louise Milligan plays the context card.
-
Latest Posts
- The new ‘dog ate my homework’
- Politico: Establishment GOP steamrollered in the Golden State
- Let Your Hair Down, Mr Dutton
- The worst and most life-damaging Premier in Australian history
- Francis Sullivan orders bishops to order Catholics how to vote
- Well sonofabitch, Jens Stoltenberg admits NATO started a war
- Tucker on state-run media, the Murdochs, Biden showering with his own daughter and how Barack Obama is still running things
-
Recent Comments
-
TCL Archive
- September 2023 (73)
- August 2023 (74)
- July 2023 (89)
- June 2023 (81)
- May 2023 (88)
- April 2023 (90)
- March 2023 (118)
- February 2023 (84)
- January 2023 (101)
- December 2022 (62)
- November 2022 (72)
- October 2022 (83)
- September 2022 (81)
- August 2022 (82)
- July 2022 (83)
- June 2022 (113)
- May 2022 (80)
- April 2022 (114)
- March 2022 (117)
- February 2022 (120)
- January 2022 (126)
- December 2021 (116)
- November 2021 (112)
- October 2021 (126)
- September 2021 (84)
- August 2021 (6)
-
Post Categories
- Art, music, letters
- Australian police state
- Climate hoax
- Culture
- Defence and national security
- Economics and the economy
- Education
- Elections
- Ethics and morality
- Fake conservatism
- Fake news
- Fake science
- Federal politics
- Foreign policy
- General
- History
- International
- Left-wing extremism
- Left-wing hypocrisy
- Legal affairs
- Media
- Politics
- Religion and faith
- Rule of law
- Science and technology
- Social media
- Sport
- State politics
- US politics
- War and peace
- War on Christianity
- Whatever
-
The fact checkers on Kelly have it as a fact that evidence of ivermectin’s efficacy is ‘not compelling’, and this fact about ivermectin’s potential therefore leads to that leap of faith expressed as fact check that it is vaccines which are the most effective. Corrupters.
I love the slight of hand these pricks use.
They go to great lengths to claim that UAP cherry picks data by reproducing only 3 pages of the report. But don’t state any facts or figures on how they determined that the adverse reactions were not jab related. No post mortem results, nothing.
They really do rely on all leftists having room temperature IQ’s and therefore know they won’t challenge the claims.
Have the RMIT fact-checkers fact checked Louise Nilligan and Sarah Sour-Tits? Ever?
1. Nilligan tried to take out Pell, succeeded for a while until the High Court intervened. She’s now being sued left and right for libel.
2. Sour-tits ran with the Wussia collushion scandal and ended up with egg all over embittered face. Being married to Springer-Jones does that to you.