Shut up, boffins explain

6 Responses to Shut up, boffins explain

1. rosie says:

   10 November, 2021 at 12:18 pm

   The only rates that should concern people are hospitalisation and death rates.
   Though again as long as internal passports and mandates don’t exist Britons probably don’t care any more about ‘cases’
   In the US the main driver to get vaxxed is knowing someone who got very sick or died of covid.
   I dare say the poms will feel the same way about vaccines and boosters.
   What is fascinating about the UK is that they really don’t know how many people live there any more
2. Pommyal says:

   10 November, 2021 at 12:31 pm

   Just another example of the absolute bullshit being fed through the lying MSM.
3. Not Trampis says:

   10 November, 2021 at 1:06 pm

   Rosie is correct,
   Two more things to add here.
   It appears at odds with OZ data but then we do not know when they were last vaccinated.
4. Lee says:

   10 November, 2021 at 1:12 pm

   Infection Rate Higher in Vaccinated than Unvaccinated

   Who’d have thought it?
5. dover_beach says:

   10 November, 2021 at 1:56 pm

   The only rates that should concern people are hospitalisation and death rates.

   Not at all. If vaxxed are experiencing double the rate of infection then that is no small matter. Those figures are actually saying that the vaxxed are more susceptible to COVID than the unvaxxed. That matches data from a large study in Sweden which indicates a dramatic reduction in efficacy such that by the 240th day you are back to 0 and the decline continues such that you are doing worse than the unvaxxed. And those declines are reflected with respect to severity as well.
6. Tel says:

   11 November, 2021 at 7:39 am

   Ultimately every Western country (those that do not have Ivermectin available) will end up like Sweden … the virus will relentlessly spread through the population until natural immunity has sufficiently built up. That’s not a policy decision (other than depriving people of Ivermectin which is the only known working prophylactic) that’s the laws of nature … physics, chemistry, etc.

   Wearing a mask reduces your risk each time you go out wearing it, unless it’s a cloth mask and then it does nothing at all. This delays the inevitable because the risk does not reduce to zero, and sooner or later all those little risks will add up … we could argue that delaying the problem is helpful if it gives the medical system more time to get their act together, but that presumes our Chiefly Chief Health Whackers are even capable of getting their act together. The mask wearing comes at some cost, mostly discomfort and annoyance, and slightly lower oxygen levels.

   The mRNA also delays the inevitable, and it also comes at something of a cost with real people suffering real vaccine injuries, although not common this is no comfort if it happens to you. More boosters means delay the virus a bit longer, at the cost of higher risks elsewhere … it’s a tradeoff and the government is not qualified to make that decision on anyone’s behalf.

   We were told that vaccination was necessary to protect other people, because it stops the spread … this has always been a lie, it was never tested to achieve this and there has never been any sort of guarantee. In many countries around the world it has been demonstrated NOT to stop the spread, although in places like Israel they did get a few months temporary reprieve out of it. This “stop the spread” lie has consistently been the basis of vaccine mandates, and despite being proven wrong the morons just can’t help themselves going back to it again and again.