Scott Morrison locks in protection for gay children. Christians are presented there as the enemy.
-
Latest Posts
- Next up: The story of his brawl with Redfern cannibal Corn Pop
- Billion-a-Year Broadcaster Slams Extravagant Blacks
- You Bought It, You Broke It
- Boris Johnson says conservatism needs him – and Tony Abbott
- Commish Karen pleads “in fairness to him” for Muslim terrorist
- Biden’s banana republic banks on fooling High Court of Justice
- The strange zombification of a soon-to-be ousted ‘conservative’
-
Recent Comments
-
TCL Archive
- April 2024 (69)
- March 2024 (115)
- February 2024 (113)
- January 2024 (122)
- December 2023 (89)
- November 2023 (88)
- October 2023 (100)
- September 2023 (84)
- August 2023 (74)
- July 2023 (89)
- June 2023 (81)
- May 2023 (88)
- April 2023 (90)
- March 2023 (118)
- February 2023 (84)
- January 2023 (101)
- December 2022 (62)
- November 2022 (72)
- October 2022 (83)
- September 2022 (81)
- August 2022 (82)
- July 2022 (83)
- June 2022 (113)
- May 2022 (80)
- April 2022 (114)
- March 2022 (117)
- February 2022 (120)
- January 2022 (126)
- December 2021 (116)
- November 2021 (112)
- October 2021 (126)
- September 2021 (84)
- August 2021 (6)
-
Post Categories
- Art, music, letters
- Australian police state
- Climate hoax
- Culture and society
- Defence and national security
- Economics and business
- Education
- Elections
- Ethics and morality
- Fake conservatism
- Fake news
- Fake science
- Federal politics
- Foreign affairs and diplomacy
- General
- History
- International
- Left-wing extremism
- Left-wing hypocrisy
- Legal affairs
- Media
- Politics and governance
- Religion and faith
- Rule of law
- Science and technology
- Social media
- Sport
- State politics
- US politics
- War and peace
- War on Christianity
- Whatever
But moderate MPs Trent Zimmerman, Dave Sharma …
The left wing Zimmerman and Sharma are “moderates?”
LOL
Chambers’ piece was heavily sourced from within the Coalition.
I recommend people read the article above to see how the “moderates” – not called “rebels” by The Australian, oddly enough – have completely switcherooed the bill. It goes well beyond window-dressing to win broader support. It is a deliberate gutting.
What if the gay baby was unvaccinated, could we discriminate then? or just discriminate specifically for the second part?
Is unvaxxed conversion therapy illegal also? We aught not attempt to persuade them to jab in case it causes offence right?
Being homosexual or heterosexual is not a sin.
What is sinful is for anyone other than a husband and wife to have sex under Christianity.
If a person does so publicly and repents then no problem. however if they do so publicly and do not then they should be sacked if employed in a Christian institution.
On Folau he paraphrased a bible verse. He did not say anyone of those people should not play rugby. All those who were affronted by his statement do not believe in heaven or hell.
Certainly who goes to either has nothing to do with rugby australia or any employer for that matter. This is why the settlement was so disappointing. We still do not know if an employer can or cannot sacck a person for displaying a bible verse for example.
Mei Gott. Not only well punctuated and coherent, but sensible as well.
Well done, Non Compos Mentis.
Now, about that withdrawal and apology?