ABC buries the lede in an unmarked Jimmy Hoffa grave

Catching COVID-19 still seemed like a fairly unlikely possibility when Charlotte and her old schoolfriends caught up over dinner in Melbourne’s CBD recently, chatting, drinking and laughing together for the first time in many months.

Despite living through the city’s lockdowns in 2020 and 2021, the 23-year-old didn’t know anyone who had caught COVID.

The group of 13 was fully vaccinated, and they wore masks when they left the table where they spent about four hours together.

They had followed the rules, but a few days after their joyous reunion, 11 of them came down with COVID, making their dinner what one epidemiologist described as a “superspreader” event.

Mmyes, the real story isn’t the total failure of the ‘vaccine’ but the mutual solicitude of the duped.

This entry was posted in COVID, Fake science. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to ABC buries the lede in an unmarked Jimmy Hoffa grave

  1. Not Trampis says:

    No ,
    It isn’t a total failure. You can get covid even if you have two jabs BUT it is unlikely you will go to hospital ( unless you are elderly and have underlying conditions).
    The hospitals will not be under pressure, you will not take up a precious ICU bed and nurse from some-else and it is unlikely you will spread around much.

    What would total failure look like. Well the hospital system would blow up. Between 1-2 in 100 people would die directly, 1 in 12 would die indirectly and between 1 in 4 to 1in 12 would get long covid and be unable to work for a considerable time.

    In other words only a total nut job would say that and believe it.

  2. Boambee John says:

    Thank you for that medical advice Dr Non Compos Mentis. Amazing what someone who specialises in matters financial can do as a career broadening practice.

    Now, about that withdrawal of two utterly baseless assertions, and an apology.

  3. RacerX says:

    “and it is unlikely you will spread around much.”

    Unless you get together with a dozen vaxxed friends for dinner where almost all will get the covid.

    Not Trampis, Please point me to the data you relied on to suggest 1 in 12 will die indirectly from covid. Australia has had over 200,000 covid cases, can you support almost 17,000 indirect deaths?

    Deaths from covid are reportedly 1968 from 201k cases in Australia, a death rate of less than 1 in 100.

  4. dover_beach says:

    None of the 11, given their age group, would have been hospitalized or died from COVID had they been unvaxxed.

  5. twostix says:

    What would total failure look like. Well the hospital system would blow up. Between 1-2 in 100 people would die directly, 1 in 12 would die indirectly and between 1 in 4 to 1in 12 would get long covid and be unable to work for a considerable time.

    February 2020, it wants it’s ridiculous apocalyptic made up numbers back.

    Known Cases
    Age: 20-29: 39806.
    Deaths: 20-29: 9 (3 female).

    Death rate: 20-29: 0.02%, 0.01% for women.

  6. twostix says:

    So these women took the risk of the vaccine, and all future side effects, and then all got covid and now have natural immunity anyway.

    So taking the drug was 100% risk exposure and potential downside for them – all mandated by the government.

  7. Not Trampis says:

    Racer an interview on AM then an article on the conversation . The Troppo version not the Aussie one.

  8. Boambee John says:

    Non Compos Mentis

    Racer an interview on AM then an article on the conversation . The Troppo version not the Aussie one.

    Relevant dates? How much was based on the notoriously alarmist Burnett Institute modelling?

  9. Perfidious Albino says:

    Except the ‘vaccine’ has probably compromised any natural immunity they already had and/or would have developed with exposure and they can look forward to boosters every 4-6 months – maybe they can go as a group and grab some dinner together afterward.

  10. Not Trampis says:

    Oh dear The Troppo version of the conversation is UK based. It was a study based in England. Nothing to do with Burnett nor with modelling

    how many times do you have to show your ignorance on a subject.

  11. Boambee John says:

    Non Compos Mentis

    Ahah, so the Troppo study, was it based on the work of Professor “Pants Down” Ferguson?

    And the AM article? Was it based on the Troppo article (seems not, since you imply that the Troppo article followed it)?

    PS, how many times do you have to show your inability to punctuate correctly?

    PPS, being retired, I find it an amusing pastime to pull your chain. Keeping you occupied defending your intellectual sloppiness is a useful education for someone who (according to you) did not even finish primary school. A few more years of this, and I might even qualify for mature age entry to my old university.

  12. Not Trampis says:

    Really and you claimed it could be part of a burnett modelling.

    Another own goal.
    I find it downright depressing someone so clearly ignorant keeps on showing up his ignorance.

  13. Boambee John says:

    Non Compos Mentis

    Your poor reading comprehension (even of your own writing) is on display again.

    It might be that there is also a UK program called AM, but you did not specify that, as you did with the (Troppo) version of the Conversation. It was therefore quite reasonable to assume that the reference was to the ABC program, and ask if the program relied on the (Australian) Burnet Institute modelling.

    Also, poor reading comprehension again, I did not claim that everything you were babbling about was based on Burnet modelling, only asked how much was.

    I find it downright depressing someone so clearly unable to comprehend plain English continues to parade his ignorance with apparent pride.

    PS, you have not answered the question about the thoroughly discredited Perfesser “Pants Down”. Too embarrassed?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.