Woke On The Wild Side

A Melbourne woman was walking home when another woman grabbed her and told her to “lie down and have sex with me” in a shocking attack.

Lisa Jones pleaded guilty to assault with intent to commit a sexual offence and sexual assault.

She was jailed for three years and three months in the County Court of Victoria on Tuesday.

Jones, a transgender woman, spotted her victim and followed the other female down Lennox Street in Richmond in February this year.

By indulging the delusions of these disturbed men, the media and governments embolden them to act out their male urges, confident they won’t forfeit their preferred ‘identity.’ It’s common now to read a newspaper in which one reporter takes a haughty swipe at climate or covid ‘denialists’ and another presents trans-fantasy as scientific fact. This sub-category of crime will certainly grow and polite society will deserve the blame.

This entry was posted in Culture, Ethics and morality. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Woke On The Wild Side

  1. Chris M says:

    Apparently was going OK until she bit her penis.

    Oh well, at least it will get the female slammer, for a short time.

  2. jupes says:

    From the link:

    It was revealed in court Jones spent six years in a male prison in Germany for sexually abusing a six-year-old girl, before she transitioned.

    So the idiots in Australia have sent him to a female prison. What could possibly go wrong?

  3. Terry says:

    ‘…spent six years in a male prison in Germany for sexually abusing a six-year-old girl’

    …and they were here, why?

    The relevant Minister(s) should be sharing a cell with this bloke.

  4. Ivan Denisovich says:

    It is not uncommon nowadays to read a newspaper in which one reporter takes a haughty swipe at climate or covid ‘denialists’ and another presents trans-fantasy as scientific fact.

    BBC pushing the narrative:

    But Womanhood takes a sombre turn when it turns to the question of what really is a woman.

    While the ominous music keeps viewers guessing, the framing of the programme makes it clear the producers already know the answer – and it has nothing to do with being female.

    The segment is even introduced with a drag performance by a transwoman named Evie…….

    Evie is interviewed by three of the women. There’s a fun, relaxed vibe to their get-together. They’re enjoying a drink, sitting close together at a table in a club, like girls on a night out……..

    Now compare Evie’s treatment to that of Dr Nicola Williams. Williams is a feminist advocating for sex-based rights and a spokesperson for Fair Play for Women. There is nothing relaxed or fun about the vibe here……

    Throughout, Williams is treated like an unhinged bigot who must be contained.

    Meanwhile Evie claims to have been married for six years to a husband who initially didn’t know Evie was male. When Evie is asked how long they had been together before Evie told him he had been in a gay relationship all along, Evie says, ‘About three or four years’. How is that possible?, ask the women. After all, it seems improbable that an adult man, unless he was a peculiarly naive virgin, would not know that his girlfriend was male.

    But at this point, Evie, the transwoman, is allowed to play it coy. Evie is allowed to determine the boundaries of the interview, of what is and is not acceptable. ‘Questions like that, it’s quite personal… I think asking that question… opens up the narrative of what to ask and what not to ask’, says Evie. Williams, it goes without saying, is not accorded the same courtesy.

    The contrast between the treatment of both interviewees is particularly poignant because the point of Williams’ argument is that people have a right to be consulted when it comes to issues that will directly affect them. That means that trans activists should not get to make unilateral decisions about their right, say, to use women-only spaces, without consulting interested parties – in this case, women.

    Speaking to Williams, she told me that ‘the show reinforced the idea, once again, that anyone who believes sex can’t be changed and that this matters in female-only spaces should be bullied or shunned’…….

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2021/12/05/a-mans-view-of-womanhood/

    A pretty good piece but I’m not happy with the descriptor “transwoman” or the inference that women need to consult with men about them using women’s toilets.

  5. Tom says:

    Thousands of “progressive” public policy pushers will never pay a price for the violent crime they have inflicted on the rest of us because they judge their intentions righteous in the same way that serial killers protest that “someone else made me do it”.

    The people who rule over us are depraved psychopaths who pretend they’re not. It is not just the LNP and ALP hacks who make it to public office, but the busybodies who staff their policymaking and have never had a job in the real economy.

  6. C.L. says:

    The people who rule over us are depraved psychopaths who pretend they’re not.

    That is definitely the feel of this period in history.
    Their trans-delusion will inevitably get people killed.
    And when I say people, I mean women.

  7. FlyingPigs says:

    C.L.

    I don’t disagree that women are disadvantaged or at harm from the psychopathic rule makers of the ‘trans-gender’ laws but there was a recent study done in USA showing trans are more liable to kill each other!

    The violence within the trans types community is epic.

    Be stuffed if I can find it, yet.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.