Just like a lockdown: Top docs warn Australia’s rapid test policy failure only protects the rich.
-
Latest Posts
-
Recent Comments
-
TCL Archive
- August 2022 (47)
- July 2022 (83)
- June 2022 (113)
- May 2022 (80)
- April 2022 (114)
- March 2022 (117)
- February 2022 (120)
- January 2022 (126)
- December 2021 (116)
- November 2021 (112)
- October 2021 (126)
- September 2021 (84)
- August 2021 (6)
-
Post Categories
- Art, music, letters
- Australian police state
- Climate hoax
- COVID
- COVID hysteria
- Culture
- Defence and national security
- Economics and the economy
- Education
- Elections
- Ethics and morality
- Fake conservatism
- Fake news
- Fake science
- Federal politics
- Foreign policy
- Freedom
- General
- History
- Hypocrisy of the left
- Innovation and technology
- International
- Left-wing extremism
- Legal affairs
- Media
- Politics
- Religion and faith
- Rule of law
- Social media
- Sport
- State politics
- US politics
- War and peace
-
Sinclair Davidson
-
The Cat Empire
Blogroll
Scary Mary is going to need some serious therapy once her media use-by date arrives. She’ll need to check in to the Rosie Batty Limelight Deprivation clinic.
Governments around the country are scrambling to buy RATs. This was all predictable. Should have ordered them ages ago. More gross mismanagement. Oh well, divide et impera.
Petros
Serious question, are RATs any more reliable than the PCR test?
Not as far as I know. Nothing is 100 percent. My prediction, they will give up on using RATs too as the numbers will swamp the supply of the RATs.
Last official report said after positive RAT you have to have a PCR for a more accurate “diagnosis”. Yes, a completely discredited PCR test. Replaced by a RAT. Which is less accurate.
No, I’m not joking.
Why?
They are not needed for omicron, redundant now.
One cannot predict if the next variant would be milder or not, particularly when leaky vaccines are being used.
Without these tests how will people without symptoms know if they are sick?