This is not 1950 anymore … this is a new year, this is a new decade, this is a new Australia and there is no room.”
– Federal Liberal MP Angie Bell not only joins and endorses the Twitter-driven jihad on Brisbane’s Citipointe Christian College, she implies Christian orthodoxy is now illegal. In 1950, Australian soldiers were at war with Chinese communists who believed the same thing.
No-one is forced to send their children to a Christian school even if it is pentecostal.
I would assume if parents had children who were practicing homosexuals or transgender a Christian school would be the last place they would send them. After all practicing homosexuality and attempting to change the sex of what god made you are totally contrary to biblical teaching.
Can I also get another thing off my chest. No kid has ever been told to leave a Christian school simply because they were attracted to the same sex. Nor has any teacher.
The only people who have been asked to leave are people who have publicly announced they were in same sex relationships.
Atheists and God haters like Angie Bell are in this country free to hold their views of course. But history is clear that the West was formed from a Biblical world view. So the inevitable fact it comes down to is they hate Western culture.
Angie Bell hates Australian culture. You are correct CL, her views align with Communism.
Now I wonder how she will handle the Moslem school beliefs.
Non Mentis
I would assume if parents had children who were practicing homosexuals or transgender a Christian school would be the last place they would send them.
You are assuming that the “activist” class is comprised of well-balanced people of good will. There is very little evidence to support such an assumption. See the many examples relating to wedding embellishments for homosexual weddings, where the activists deliberately targeted Christian bakers.
to correct you there is no such thing as a Christian baker. There might be bakers who are Christian. They would go broke if they only served Christians.
There are a lot of fornicators and adulterers ( much more in number than homosexual) who would be buying their merchandise.
Just remember Christians were never told not to sell food to any idolaters , they were told not to share the food in a meal with them.
Non Mentis
Take your point about the difference between “a Christian baker” and “a baker who is a Christian”.
As for “a lot of fornicators and adulterers ( much more in number than homosexual) who would be buying their merchandise”, the point is that the fornicators and adulterers usually do not flaunt their sins. The homosexual activists seeking a “wedding” cake are doing so.
This was the issue that made Cardinal Pell an enemy of the activist class. By wearing rainbow regalia to communion, they were flaunting their sin before him. He therefore refused them communion.
PS, do you really equate homosexuals with idolaters? And would the idolaters ask for a cake with their idol decorating it? Back to kindy with you!
both are unrepentant sinners.
Non Mentis
You really do have a reading comprehension problem, possibly the reason you never finished kindy. The fornicators and adulterers are not flaunting their unrepentant sinning, so unless the baker who is a Christian is also a mind reader, what is in their hearts is not known. However, the homosexual couple asking for a decorated wedding cake is are flaunting their unrepentant sinning.
My local Fed member. I actually think she doesn’t exist. Somebody just cuts and pastes from the ABC for her newsletters. Last time seen? In parliament talking about the wrong bill.