The Premier insists she’ll do what ATAGI says but if that’s at odds with polls, watch the scandal-plagued pseudo-heroine dump the ‘science’ to avoid being honked.
-
Latest Posts
-
Recent Comments
-
TCL Archive
- September 2023 (84)
- August 2023 (74)
- July 2023 (89)
- June 2023 (81)
- May 2023 (88)
- April 2023 (90)
- March 2023 (118)
- February 2023 (84)
- January 2023 (101)
- December 2022 (62)
- November 2022 (72)
- October 2022 (83)
- September 2022 (81)
- August 2022 (82)
- July 2022 (83)
- June 2022 (113)
- May 2022 (80)
- April 2022 (114)
- March 2022 (117)
- February 2022 (120)
- January 2022 (126)
- December 2021 (116)
- November 2021 (112)
- October 2021 (126)
- September 2021 (84)
- August 2021 (6)
-
Post Categories
- Art, music, letters
- Australian police state
- Climate hoax
- Culture
- Defence and national security
- Economics and the economy
- Education
- Elections
- Ethics and morality
- Fake conservatism
- Fake news
- Fake science
- Federal politics
- Foreign policy
- General
- History
- International
- Left-wing extremism
- Left-wing hypocrisy
- Legal affairs
- Media
- Politics
- Religion and faith
- Rule of law
- Science and technology
- Social media
- Sport
- State politics
- US politics
- War and peace
- War on Christianity
- Whatever
-
People are over the pandemic that is over.
To assume that people are over the pandemic which is over is to assume that there had been a pandemic. Coerced covid jabbing does not a covid pandemic make.
ATGI Rationale for booster.
It is expected that a booster will increase protection against symptomatic infection and this should lead to a parallel increase in protection against transmission, therefore providing some indirect protection to the wider population. However, evidence to confirm this, and the duration of protection, is awaited.
Since when has an “expectation” that something “should” provide “some indirect protection” without “evidence”?
Note that the word “Death” has been avoided completely in their statement.
Firstly, there is no way this is not deliberate.
My first thought is that ATAGI no longer considers death a relevant rationale.
Why then would they recommend a booster based on nothing but ifs, shoulds, and expectations, if prevention of death is not a rationale?
Then, because ATAGI has declassified death, are we not entitled to assume a zero death position, and start to look at the net benefit of the vaccines.
There is a famous doctor/scientist/politican in Victoria who preached “if it saves one life”.
Apparently the “one” is him
Are there still pubs and restaurants open? News to me.
You must live in Melbourne Ted.