“The judge has not been identified to protect the women”

5 Responses to “The judge has not been identified to protect the women”

1. Shy Ted says:

   17 February, 2022 at 12:01 pm

   2 candidates for AOTY 2023?
2. Franx says:

   17 February, 2022 at 3:16 pm

   The report is about allegations of behaviour which may yet be found to be neither ‘wrong’ nor ‘reprehensible’. Then again, the Chief Justice can tell when a victim is a compelling witness of truth, quite apart from any evidence.
   ‘
3. vlad redux says:

   17 February, 2022 at 5:19 pm

   I’m still waiting for “Chief Justice” Anne Ferguson to apologise for her own incompetence in the Pell case.
4. C.L. says:

   17 February, 2022 at 5:23 pm

   Peter Vickery, QC names himself. Same link.
5. Morsie says:

   18 February, 2022 at 9:24 am

   What a chick magnet.In my experience many barristers fancy themselves as irresistible to women.