The New York Times reported this past weekend that the CDC has chosen not to publish huge amounts of COVID data, instead keeping it secret, because it fears that the information would cause ‘vaccine hesitancy’ among the American public.https://t.co/CEtA4jV3F4
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) February 21, 2022
Why would it cause “vaccine hesitancy”?
How odd. Aren’t they very safe and very effective?
News widely today is you can now go and get your very very safe and very very effective 4th vaccination. It’s even more very safe and very effective than the third jab, which mysteriously is no longer enough.
Kaiser Fung has made valid criticisms of the CDC and the data.
Non Mentis
Perhaps you could share a link? Or is that too hard for someone who never finished kindy?
LOL.
NIH Sent The Intercept 292 Fully Redacted Pages Related to Virus Research in Wuhan (20 Feb, via Instapundit)
Well to be fair at the very top of each page they did leave the date (March 16, 2020) and the NIH logo unredacted…
(Just in case Homer doesn’t know, from the actual FEC data since 2015 CDC employees gave 99.95% of their political donations to the Democrats. The place is leftier than the ABC, which is really saying something.)
The CDC and NIH have to be very careful not to reveal their sources and methods … it might put one of their field agents at risk n at.
Bruce of N
(Just in case Homer doesn’t know, from the actual FEC data since 2015 CDC employees gave 99.95% of their political donations to the Democrats. The place is leftier than the ABC, which is really saying something.)
Ssssshhhh! You’ve just convinced him that the CDC is the fount of all knowledge (not just in relation to diseases) in the world.
Naturally releasing the data is going to cause “vaccine hesitancy” if it confirms what many in the public suspect – and the CDC and Big Pharma know – that it can kill or permanently impair one’s health (sometimes devastatingly so).
Very hesitant