Please stop using the ridiculous, quasi-PC tautology, ‘biological male.’ There is no other kind.
- Paul Kelly savages the Albanese Voice as a dangerous disaster
- D9 Right of Kings
- The Battle of Brisbane
- Less threatening than chow mein
- Left-wing men are suddenly concerned about women’s safety
- Without evidence, peak lawyers say Voice will solve everything
- Awarded a Gold Medal for Sacred Architecture by Pope Francis
- March 2023 (85)
- February 2023 (84)
- January 2023 (101)
- December 2022 (62)
- November 2022 (72)
- October 2022 (83)
- September 2022 (81)
- August 2022 (82)
- July 2022 (83)
- June 2022 (113)
- May 2022 (80)
- April 2022 (114)
- March 2022 (117)
- February 2022 (120)
- January 2022 (126)
- December 2021 (116)
- November 2021 (112)
- October 2021 (126)
- September 2021 (84)
- August 2021 (6)
- Art, music, letters
- Australian police state
- Climate hoax
- COVID hysteria
- Defence and national security
- Economics and the economy
- Ethics and morality
- Fake conservatism
- Fake news
- Fake science
- Federal politics
- Foreign policy
- Hypocrisy of the left
- Innovation and technology
- Left-wing extremism
- Legal affairs
- Religion and faith
- Rule of law
- Social media
- State politics
- US politics
- War and peace
- War on Christianity
The Cat Empire
Correct, I note that bimbo Daisy Cousins last night on Bolt referring to “transwomen” and “biological women”.
Repeat after me….
1. Transwomen are not women.
2. Transwomen are not women.
3. Transwomen are not women.
Sometimes it’s hard to emphasise one’s point without resorting to ‘hyper bowl’ (yes that was intended to be said in a gillardian nasal twang) when pushing against obviously egregious gaslighting
Since most of these male “transgender” people have not had the “nip & tuck”, why are they not referred to as transvestites or cross-dressers??
Cos that’s what they are – poor sad people playing dress-up in mummy’s clothes.
Has anyone asked Judge Jackson to define what a man is yet?
I’m all ears.
Even that makes no difference, though.
A self-mutilated male is still a male.
Yes, I’m sticking with calling them men.
And I’m going to continue to defiantly call ‘chest feeders’ women.
As much as I agree with you, the only way they’re going to get their message out without being labelled bigots and therefore ignored is to play that piece of legal fiction
Sick and tired of society being in thrall to the mentally ill and sexual perverts.
Biologically male as opposed to culturally masculine.
Yes we have a perfectly good language but we also run into plenty large of dishonest people who will deliberately misconstrue everything and twist it around. Thus the need to make everything untwistable … like “traditional Christian hetrosexual marriage” for example, has only one possible meaning, even though it’s cumbersome and somewhat redundant.
If you listened to the left, you could be forgiven for thinking that heterosexual marriage doesn’t exist outside of Christianity.
Next, there will be “first nations people’ to describe a disparate collection of stone age tribes. I don’t think the trans were around then.
worth repeating Christine Anderson
“Yes, why don’t we just tell he truth about Lia Thomas?
A “woman” with a penis is a man with no balls!
Men overpowering women used to be considered cowards!
And that’s exactly what Lia Thomas is: A coward – an opportunistic one at that!”