Memo to those speaking out against males in women’s sport

Please stop using the ridiculous, quasi-PC tautology, ‘biological male.’ There is no other kind.
This entry was posted in Culture, Media. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Memo to those speaking out against males in women’s sport

  1. Cassie of Sydney says:

    Correct, I note that bimbo Daisy Cousins last night on Bolt referring to “transwomen” and “biological women”.

    Repeat after me….

    1. Transwomen are not women.
    2. Transwomen are not women.
    3. Transwomen are not women.

  2. Buccaneer says:

    Sometimes it’s hard to emphasise one’s point without resorting to ‘hyper bowl’ (yes that was intended to be said in a gillardian nasal twang) when pushing against obviously egregious gaslighting

  3. Fat Tony says:

    Since most of these male “transgender” people have not had the “nip & tuck”, why are they not referred to as transvestites or cross-dressers??
    Cos that’s what they are – poor sad people playing dress-up in mummy’s clothes.

  4. Bruce of Newcastle says:

    Has anyone asked Judge Jackson to define what a man is yet?
    I’m all ears.

  5. C.L. says:

    Since most of these male “transgender” people have not had the “nip & tuck”, why are they not referred to as transvestites or cross-dressers??

    Even that makes no difference, though.
    A self-mutilated male is still a male.

  6. rosie says:

    Yes, I’m sticking with calling them men.
    And I’m going to continue to defiantly call ‘chest feeders’ women.

  7. A reader says:

    As much as I agree with you, the only way they’re going to get their message out without being labelled bigots and therefore ignored is to play that piece of legal fiction

  8. Lee says:

    Sick and tired of society being in thrall to the mentally ill and sexual perverts.

  9. Tel says:

    Biologically male as opposed to culturally masculine.

    Yes we have a perfectly good language but we also run into plenty large of dishonest people who will deliberately misconstrue everything and twist it around. Thus the need to make everything untwistable … like “traditional Christian hetrosexual marriage” for example, has only one possible meaning, even though it’s cumbersome and somewhat redundant.

  10. Lee says:

    Thus the need to make everything untwistable … like “traditional Christian hetrosexual marriage”

    If you listened to the left, you could be forgiven for thinking that heterosexual marriage doesn’t exist outside of Christianity.

  11. bollux says:

    Next, there will be “first nations people’ to describe a disparate collection of stone age tribes. I don’t think the trans were around then.

  12. howardb says:

    worth repeating Christine Anderson

    “Yes, why don’t we just tell he truth about Lia Thomas?

    A “woman” with a penis is a man with no balls!

    Men overpowering women used to be considered cowards!

    And that’s exactly what Lia Thomas is: A coward – an opportunistic one at that!”

    https://mobile.twitter.com/AndersonAfDMdEP/status/1508505381693276167

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.