
-
Latest Posts
- Adam Smithereens
- Greg Sheridan on Roberts-Smith and lessons from Afghanistan
- You’ve Never Seen The Line?
- Netball Australia’s endorsement was less influential than hoped
- A misogynist might joke that it’s usually the other way around
- Vendetta lunch lasted longer than David Sharaz’s first marriage
- Hanoi Vane
-
Recent Comments
-
TCL Archive
- June 2023 (18)
- May 2023 (88)
- April 2023 (90)
- March 2023 (118)
- February 2023 (84)
- January 2023 (101)
- December 2022 (62)
- November 2022 (72)
- October 2022 (83)
- September 2022 (81)
- August 2022 (82)
- July 2022 (83)
- June 2022 (113)
- May 2022 (80)
- April 2022 (114)
- March 2022 (117)
- February 2022 (120)
- January 2022 (126)
- December 2021 (116)
- November 2021 (112)
- October 2021 (126)
- September 2021 (84)
- August 2021 (6)
-
Post Categories
- Art, music, letters
- Australian police state
- Climate hoax
- COVID
- COVID hysteria
- Culture
- Defence and national security
- Economics and the economy
- Education
- Elections
- Ethics and morality
- Fake conservatism
- Fake news
- Fake science
- Federal politics
- Foreign policy
- Freedom
- General
- History
- Hypocrisy of the left
- Innovation and technology
- International
- Left-wing extremism
- Legal affairs
- Media
- Politics
- Religion and faith
- Rule of law
- Social media
- Sport
- State politics
- US politics
- War and peace
- War on Christianity
- Whatever
-
The Cat Empire
Blogroll
-
His Holiness with this guy reminds me of that honorific salutation for politicians – the Right Honourable – being rarely right and certainly not honourable.
Well he is the anti-Christ.
No Chris, he’s the mediocre Supreme Pontiff of the One True Church.
Saw that story yesterday and immediately thought of Romans 14:2.
I wish he’d give up the climate rubbish.
To be fair, the same day the Church of England came out with this one.
Church of England Says There Is ‘No Official Definition’ of a Woman (13 Jul)
Their reading should now be of Genesis chapters 2 and 3.
He’s a God hater first and foremost. The leader of a Church that never preaches the Gospel but does extol Marxism.
There is no official definition of “woke” and “dickhead”, but it doesn’t mean that a CoE leader like Dr. Robert Innes isn’t both.
And a misogynist.
Living without so many superfluous things … if it was my choice, and someone asked me which one needs to be gone for good, and the option was either meat or religion … let me tell you I would keep the meat and say “Sorry” to the Pope.
Atheism is a declaration of efficiency.
Some titles are correctly pronounced with a sarcastic tone.
Thanks to Gab for reminding me of this very apposite discussion between Jim Hacker and Humphrey Appleby:
I don’t think Francis is clever enough to be the Antichrist. It will be one of his successors.
I am put in mind of the following:-
Yeats
Written in different times, but no less relevant today.
Awesome yes minister episode.
TBF, I think Prince Charles might be the antichrist. The only flaw in the theory being he is even stupider than Francis.
Entropy – you may well be correct, both don’t seem overly sharp. But note there are multiple Antichrists mentioned – a plurality of them.
Pope Francis has been a superspreader of heresy and confusion ever since he first walked out onto the Papal balcony and gave that sickening display of confected humility.
And notice that instead of being humble enough to draw from the riches of the Catholic Tradition, he’s forever quoting himself. Yes Pope Francis, you’re definitely the greatest thinker in the history of the Church.
The entire series was magnificent, mostly thanks to the great Nigel Hawthorn.
Involuntarily outed as gay in later life, Sir Nigel had always guarded his privacy and never participated in the ‘gay scene’ or gay polemics. A British gentleman and an incredible talent.