Unemployed Brit gives “emotional speech” to about 11 people

This entry was posted in Fake news, International. Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to Unemployed Brit gives “emotional speech” to about 11 people

  1. rosie says:

    If he was half as smart as he thinks he is he’d be twice as smart as he really is.

  2. Not Trampis says:

    unemployed.

    He is making quite a bit of money.

    good to see you as accurate as usual.

  3. Lee says:

    He is making quite a bit of money.

    Courtesy the taxpayers.
    But not earning it.

  4. Jannie says:

    Yeah CL grifting is a sort of employment.

  5. Fat Tony says:

    Courtesy the taxpayers.
    But not earning it.

    That’s a big problem throughout the world now – too many parasites.
    The system got wealthy through the work of many and now it’s infested with parasites.
    Eventually, the host will die, along with the parasites.

  6. Not Trampis says:

    actually british taxpayers have nothing to do with it. It is yanks they are getting money from.

    I pay little attention to royal matters given I am a republican but even I know that.

    Fancy deplorables being ignorant about that. Put that down on their large list they know nothing about.

  7. Fat Tony says:

    Not Trampis says:
    19 July, 2022 at 3:27 pm
    actually british taxpayers have nothing to do with it. It is yanks they are getting money from.

    I just referred to “the work of many” – not “British taxpayers”.
    The parasites feast off the wealth generators, regardless of country.

    But you knew that – just being an f/wit again.

  8. Boambee John says:

    Fat Tony

    If Non Mentis is actually a wankerdemic, he might be a bit sensitive about the reference to “parasites”. May be a bit too close to home.

  9. Lee says:

    actually british taxpayers have nothing to do with it. It is yanks they are getting money from.

    Nowhere did I mention which taxpayers they were.
    You have a recurring habit of adding words or attributing comments to others that were not actually made by them, and denying or being deliberately vague about what you wrote yourself.

  10. Old School Conservative says:

    actually british taxpayers have nothing to do with it. It is yanks they are getting money from.

    Currently, yes.
    But Harry moved to the US courtesy of a “substantial sum” from Charles to “support their transition to financial independence”.
    Harry also took possession of a lot of Diana’s wealth after her death.
    So in there are a lot of taxpayer contributions. Neither Charles nor Diana got wealthy in their own right, like selling Amway or writing code.

  11. Jannie says:

    Bunyip republican, hereditary privilege for alphabet people.

  12. and says:

    Always entertaining to hear the pontificating bilge… the woke wankerfications… of the Duke and Duchess of Netflix or, as Piers Morgan refers to them, Ginge and Cringe.

    It’s on a regular basis that the dim-witted duo provide “guidance” to the masses, particularly if it can be incorporated into a Keeping-Up-With-The-Kardashians-like Netflix offering. From just a few weeks ago –

    Meghan Markle says MEN need to be ‘more vocal’ with their anger in wake of the Supreme Court’s Roe v Wade decision and describes Prince Harry’s reaction to the news as ‘guttural’ in Vogue interview with Gloria Steinem

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10963083/Meghan-Markle-says-men-need-vocal-wake-Roe-v-Wade-describes-Harrys-reaction.html

  13. rosie says:

    I can imagine the guttural reaction of smerkle to perhaps a few less babies being sacrificed to gaia.

  14. and says:

    Prince Harry labelled a ‘platinum plated plonker’ by Martin Daubney

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGdwmrAzYKE
    .

  15. and says:

    Prince Harry & Meghan Markle take Netflix crew to the United Nations

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61QmAIE_ang
    .

  16. Tel says:

    Neither Charles nor Diana got wealthy in their own right, like selling Amway or writing code.

    The Prince had some kind of organic grow-op underway … but dunno whether it was profitable or merely trading on the royal reputation.

  17. twostix says:

    Speaking of cringe videos of the bugman class.

    Behold.

    They’re making their own morality warning tales to show children. “Don’t do what they did, or you’ll end up like this”

  18. C.L. says:

    Ando’s Daily Mail link:

    Meghan Markle has urged men to be ‘more vocal’ with their anger at the repealing of Roe v. Wade, as she revealed that Prince Harry’s response to the news on Friday was ‘guttural’.

    The Duchess of Sussex, 40, spoke to Vogue magazine in conversation with author and activist Gloria Steinem, 88, and journalist Jessica Yellin…

    Markle said that all men need to join women in the fight to protect abortion rights.

    ‘Men need to be vocal in this moment and beyond because these are decisions that affect relationships, families, and communities at large,’ she said.

    ‘They may target women, but the consequences impact all of us.

    ‘My husband and I talked about that a lot over the past few days. He’s a feminist too.’

    Steinem, who was approached by Markle in 2020, when the Duchess realized that she was sheltering during the pandemic near their California home, said she could confirm that Harry was deeply interested in women’s rights.

    She called the pair ‘chosen family’.

    ‘His reaction last week was guttural, like mine,’ Markle said.

    Looks like he’s not coming back.

  19. Not Trampis says:

    so now deplorables say courtesy the taxpayers means nothing like the words say they do.
    Stupid is as stupid does.

    Well they are not property developers and certainly not grifters unless deplorables think that word has another meaning.

  20. Boambee John says:

    Non Mentis continues to think that screeching “deplorables” is an argument-winning tactic.

    All that this shows is his limited intellect, which is to be expected in someone who failed pre-school. His poor punctuation also demonstrates that reality.

  21. Not Trampis says:

    Our primary school drop out naturally fails to see the contradiction I showed.
    Given his limited education this is a natural extension of his limited means.

    Can someone please show how this couple is grifting or is this yet another example of deplorables not knowing what they are talking about.

  22. Boambee John says:

    Non Mentis

    How utterly deplorable.

    PS, I now avoid even trying to have a actual debate with you, you have convincingly demonstrated that your mind is set harder than concrete, and that you are never able (or even willing) to offer actual facts to support your many delusional assertions.

    But trolling you can be fun!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.