Hopped-up Joe Biden’s latest howler proves Donald Trump still owns what remains of his mind.
-
Latest Posts
- Adam Smithereens
- Greg Sheridan on Roberts-Smith and lessons from Afghanistan
- You’ve Never Seen The Line?
- Netball Australia’s endorsement was less influential than hoped
- A misogynist might joke that it’s usually the other way around
- Vendetta lunch lasted longer than David Sharaz’s first marriage
- Hanoi Vane
-
Recent Comments
-
TCL Archive
- June 2023 (18)
- May 2023 (88)
- April 2023 (90)
- March 2023 (118)
- February 2023 (84)
- January 2023 (101)
- December 2022 (62)
- November 2022 (72)
- October 2022 (83)
- September 2022 (81)
- August 2022 (82)
- July 2022 (83)
- June 2022 (113)
- May 2022 (80)
- April 2022 (114)
- March 2022 (117)
- February 2022 (120)
- January 2022 (126)
- December 2021 (116)
- November 2021 (112)
- October 2021 (126)
- September 2021 (84)
- August 2021 (6)
-
Post Categories
- Art, music, letters
- Australian police state
- Climate hoax
- COVID
- COVID hysteria
- Culture
- Defence and national security
- Economics and the economy
- Education
- Elections
- Ethics and morality
- Fake conservatism
- Fake news
- Fake science
- Federal politics
- Foreign policy
- Freedom
- General
- History
- Hypocrisy of the left
- Innovation and technology
- International
- Left-wing extremism
- Legal affairs
- Media
- Politics
- Religion and faith
- Rule of law
- Social media
- Sport
- State politics
- US politics
- War and peace
- War on Christianity
- Whatever
-
The Cat Empire
Blogroll
-
Preposterous
Yeah, yeah. That’s very plausible.
[Actually, it’s incredibly stupid.]
Well, it was done by the DemonRats, so by definition it is incredibly stupid.
Preposterous
showed you specifically that a Trump insider knew that Trump would declare victory on election night on false pretences.
You have been shown specifically that Shrillary tried to declare victory on election night, also on false pretences. She had to be calmed down by her staff, and refused to concede in public.
– The Independent, 15 Jan 2021
You reckon it’s impossible Bannon and Trump spoke before the election?
Preposterous
And all BlowJ has got is “what about Hillary!” (I don’t even know what he is on about, and it matters for naught anyway) as well as his new “but you’ve been fooled because you haven’t watched 14,000 hours of raw video” – when he hasn’t seen it either.
So plausible – because the video we have seen is so, so ambiguous. [Complete sarcasm, of course.]
Non Mentis (he without a mind) has shown greater ability to comprehend plain English than you have. If you do not understand (or, worse, are unaware of), the Shrillary issue, I am amazed that you remember to breathe.
You also seemed to be unaware of the restricted release of the security footage, suggesting that your knowledge of the events of 6 January is extremely shallow. Ditto on the issue of the actually released video. If you think that the editing and selection was politically impartial, you are a fool, or biased. Probably both.
And you have the hide to call other people conspiracy theorists. The fact is that you are misrepresenting what Bannon said by casting him as an agent of Trump, when he was just running a commentary.
It’s quite the co-incidence, isn’t it?
In fact, I think, there are others who were in the White House who have specifically said they said to Trump on the election night not to declare victory, it was too early in the vote.
But Trump took the drunk flake’s advise and did what Bannon predicted he would (whether or not Bannon put the idea into Trump’s head too – not 100% clear but would hardly be surprising that they were talking before the election.)
But Trump thinks he won the election and there was massive fraud, so we gotta pretend he is genuine and have some massive investigation into inventions and ignorant claims of “that looked suspicious to me” which were looked into by a lackey like Barr and dissolved into nothing.
That’s your case – “well I don’t think it was investigated enough”.
Versus Barr, suck ass who would vote for Trump again, “I had several claims looked into, and there was nothing to them. I told Trump. He wouldn’t believe me, he barely seemed capable of living in reality, and I resigned.” That’s a paraphrase, but pretty close to his evidence.
Preposterous
the drunk flake’s advise
Enough about Shrillary!
PS, that’s “advice”; “advise” is a verb, not a noun.
Preposterous
But Trump thinks he won the election and there was massive fraud, so we gotta pretend he is genuine and have some massive investigation into inventions and ignorant claims of “that looked suspicious to me” which were looked into by a lackey like Barr and dissolved into nothing.
It is somewhat strange that you seem unaware of any developments since 6 January. Multiple investigations at state level have disclosed reasonable grounds for suspicion, but the federal authorities (who want to take over election management, contra the Constitution) are completely uninterested (but certainly not disinterested).
Here’s Politico, summing it up (from the Jan 6 committee investigation):
But Bucco in Australia says “I don’t think it was investigated enough. It’s real suspicious how they didn’t investigate it. Must be something to hide!”
You think you’re not a conspiracy theorist, but you actually are. Of the kind “I’m not saying it’s fraud. But we’ll never know for sure…”
They have not. I read the news too.
You’ll a gullible consumer of highly partisan “investigators” flakey conclusions that don’t stand up.
You a believer in 20000000 Mules, too, I would guess.
Prepo, second hand accounts that people told Trump there was nothing to see. I wouldn’t take that if the roles were reversed, but you would here. All the things you accuse others of being, you are yourself. You’re just too intellectually and emotionally dishonest to recognise it.
Preposterous
I have not viewed 20000000 Mules, nor even 2000 Mules. Perhaps you could summarise both, in fewer than 20000000 words?
Don’t ever get on a jury.
It’s not “second hand accounts”. It is first hand evidence of what they told Trump. On oath. Several people telling a consistent story.
“It’s a crock”.
I’ve been on a jury, but it wasn’t a show trial with a teleprompter and no cross examination. and when a witness pulled a howler like Cassidy Hutchinson, the judge let us ask for more information.
Preposterous
Then you didn’t enjoy it? What was the low point?
And whose fault is that? Republicans, of course.
Don’t crap on. You don’t have to watch a documentary to know it’s crap if enough people write about why it’s crap.
You know, I hear that there’s some docos explaining how the WTC was actually a controlled demolition. How dare you dismiss this without watching those docos.
How childish is that, you keep accusing Trump off being a man child, but the observation I would make is that no one beat a child by out childing them.
Preposterous
And whose fault is that? Republicans, of course.
That you claim to believe this demonstrates how ignorant you choose to be.
Preposterous
Don’t crap on. You don’t have to watch a documentary to know it’s crap if enough people write about why it’s crap.
Particularly if those people support your entrenched beliefs.
Prospero is incredibly astute at cherry picking the exact evidence he pays attention to, while at the same time accusing others of not looking at evidence, because they look at something he wants to ignore.
Any moron can watch a video … it takes someone quite special to carefully select exactly they right videos that lead to the perfect pre-conceived conclusion.
Tel
Why else would Pelosi have suppressed most of the CCTV recordings, and released only selected bits?