Biden’s 2020 ‘victory’ was rigged. That is no longer debatable

This entry was posted in Elections, History, Rule of law. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Biden’s 2020 ‘victory’ was rigged. That is no longer debatable

  1. Jannie says:

    I was hoping to review a bit more data before declaring the science to be settled.

  2. C.L. says:

    You make a good point, Jannie, if I understand you correctly.

    That the election was rigged is no longer open to debate.

    The FBI and Big Tech did interfere with the poll.

    State legislatures did attempt to fix the balloting.

    A poll this week shows a large majority of Americans believe the FBI’s criminal intervention alone (re Hunter’s laptop) swung the election.

    As for whether Biden didn’t really win a majority of votes (legitimately cast) – that is a separate question. To rig an event is not necessarily to have succeeded in being the preponderant force in something actually happening. It is enough to say with certainty that 1) the election was rigged; 2) it is, ispo facto, so tainted as to be quantitatively indecipherable and rationally disputable.

  3. Lee says:

    Waiting for the usual suspects to chime in vehemently that it never happened …

  4. Lee says:

    If I may go a little off-topic, the groundwork is being laid to blame Trump for the growing bad news on vaccines, even though Biden himself said they were safe:

  5. Jannie says:

    CL I have seen a lot of evidence of election interference and do not doubt it. But I have not seen a coherent analysis of the various issues; mail in votes being harvested, lack of scrutiny over the count, ballot boxes delivered at 2am without scrutiny, the statistical questions, and some sense of numbers. The election had the highest turnout in history, Biden got 81 m votes, 7 m more than Trump. Supposedly more black people voted for Biden than Obama. Etc.

    Unfortunately I haven’t seen anything that would necessarily matters for the next election. The Left controls “opinion polling” and elections seem to follow.

  6. jupes says:

    But I have not seen a coherent analysis of the various issues;

    Look harder.

  7. Jannie says:

    Send me a link Jupes

  8. C.L. says:

    Tucker Carlson making the same point I made above, basically:

  9. Bruce of Newcastle says:

    The Dems seem very complacent about the mid-terms. No panic, no tacking towards the centre. Indeed they’re doubling down on stupid (eg. student loan forgiveness).

    That says the November election is going to be a stacked deck. They’ve had two more years of time to get more of their people into the election apparatus and to practice their methods. And the software is still all in place.

    I wonder if they’ll overstep and start a revolution. Must be getting damned close to an explosion.

  10. C.L. says:

    Interesting, Bruce.
    Yeah, they do seem pretty casual.

  11. jupes says:

    Download 2000 Mules for a start Jannie. Next have a look here:
    But really, the evidence comes in daily. The FBI colluding with big-tech over Hunter’s laptop is just the latest. Look at what the deep state is doing to stop investigations of any of this. Look at how investigations are nobbled. Look at what the media are doing to cover up any evidence. If you want the truth, you can find it.

  12. Jannie says:

    Thanks for the link Jules. I watched 2000 mules, or excerpts a while back, it was impressive. The Navarro report seems comprehensive, but he is a Trump guy, and that report is described by the MSM (Wikipedia) as “widely discredited”. On the other hand they are trying to indict him for withholding info from Congress. They are trying to shut him down, along with Bannon and dozens of other from Trump camp. I tend to believe it, even if they are calling it a conspiracy theory.

    Jupes, I agree with each of your observations about cover ups, but for the last. It’s not easy to find the truth.

  13. C.L. says:

    My key point here, though, is that the FBI and Facebook interference is not a theory. That’s a fact.

  14. Buccaneer says:

    The msm describe Breitbart as discredited too, unless it’s cited in an affidavit to raid Mar A Lago, then it’s a reliable source

  15. Jannie says:

    I agree about the FBI and Facebook CL. Zuckerberg said so on Joe Rogan for a start. The harassment of Trump and associates is up front and in the open, maybe to scare the others.

  16. dover_beach says:

    Jannie, the episodes of Baris and Barnes immediately after the election explain how the steal occurred. In sum, they say that massively increasing the scale of mail-in voting while also weakening the practices that prevent fraud in the midst of a campaign that demonises one of candidates invites fraud and allows it to be laundered officially (one example of this is separating the ballots from the signature bearing envelopes, not checking the signatures adequately, then destroying the latter and thus frustrating any audit of the vote). This meant the fraud was distributed, not concentrated only in swing states. And so on.

  17. Bruce of Newcastle says:

    There was funny business with the software as well.
    Note that the Dominion voting machines still haven’t been forensically investigated.
    Dems are dying in ditches to avoid it.

  18. Boambee John says:

    Bruce of N

    Dems are dying in ditches to avoid it.

    What is it that the fascist left keeps telling us? Oh, yes, “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *