The Mind of Putin

This is worth watching for Peterson’s ‘don’t interrupt me again’ death stare alone. Morgan couldn’t resist less than 20 seconds in. As one of the more thuggish propagandists of mandates and masks (to say nothing of Zelenskyite malarkey about Ukrainian ‘democracy’), the increasingly unwatched Morgan is one to talk about lies and “terrifying his people.” My reading of Joe Biden is that he is an amoral weirdo and far more dangerous to the world than the Russian.

I’ve never been a Jordan follower but he has become a kind of Fulton Sheen for a babyish age.
This entry was posted in Culture, War and peace. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to The Mind of Putin

  1. Jannie says:

    Jordan Peterson sure looks like a younger version of Fulton Sheen, in the pics.

    JP might not be cancelled yet but the Einsatzgruppen have no doubt taken his name.

  2. C.L. says:

    I think, to his very great credit, he is now beyond cancellation.
    He must earn a good living with books, appearances and speaking.

  3. Buccaneer says:

    Biden seems not much more than an in patient creating a show to distract from the actual levers of power, he constantly strays from sane policy and is continually walked back by his handlers. It’s embarrassing and dangerous as push comes to shove he has the executive power. In more adult times, he would have been harried out by an inquisitive press, but now we have a shadow government running the show with no actual transparent agenda. This is way more troubling than anything dished up by the blow hard Trump with his weird fixation on never being wrong and putting all his family in the administration.

    Petersen is partly popular because he stands up against the same folks that provide cover for the Biden sham. Just like in Nazi Germany, there are a lot of people who know it’s wrong, but don’t feel they have the agency to change anything, they’ve been corralled, sheep like into a pen and they see no way out but to feign compliance. Petersen gives them some agency, enough to reaffirm their feelings, not enough to act in lots of cases, that takes actual leadership not just thought leadership.

    A strong and moral US leadership would never have sent mixed messages about NATO status for Ukraine or any other previously eastern bloc nation, there is little reflection about the impact this has had on the mindset of both Putin and the Russian people.

  4. Boxcar says:

    Biden is a school bully, no leadership, and no integrity.
    No one will follow him into war.
    He is so stupid, greedy, and self obsessed, he half thinks having the title gives him a mandate, and makes him the leader. but he knows real leaders are laughing at him.

  5. Cassie of Sydney says:

    JP nails it.

  6. Not Trampis says:

    A person who believes biden is more dangerous than Putin is a couple of sandwiches short of a picnic.
    how many times has biden raised the possibility of a nuclear strike?

  7. C.L. says:

    how many times has biden raised the possibility of a nuclear strike?

    How many times has a Democrat used nuclear weapons against civilians?

    How many times has a Russian premier used them?

    GO!

  8. Mantaray says:

    Not Trampis (8.38am). You were going OK with your first sentence, since ot was a simple matter of opinion.

    but then that flourish; “how many times has Biden raised the possibility of a nuclear strike?” wrecked it completely, since you are basically asserting that if Biden did threaten such stuff he’d be a nasty f’wit…(as bad as Vlad).

    And here we have Joe when asked about armed American militias….”Biden said, “If you wanted or if you think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons.” = because that’s what he has to use against rifles..

    What’s wrong with you NT? Get some psychiatric help.
    ,

  9. Buccaneer says:

    There’s a video in this link that is worth a watch, the fellow calls out the insanity of Biden suggesting that his own people need f-15s to be able to stand up for themselves against his crazy administration.

    Putin might put troops on the street, but I don’t see him threatening using jet fighters against them.

  10. Not Trampis says:

    no the question is how many times has biden raised the possibility of a nuclear strike.
    I might add how many nations has he committed war crimes. Has he committed war crimes against his own people, what about those in Georgia or Syria or now Ukraine?

    By the way a person who is amoral is actually immoral.

  11. Cassie of Sydney says:

    “no the question is how many times has biden raised the possibility of a nuclear strike.
    I might add how many nations has he committed war crimes. Has he committed war crimes against his own people, what about those in Georgia or Syria or now Ukraine?

    By the way a person who is amoral is actually immoral.”

    You are now totally incoherent…..you’re losing the plot.

    Oh and what “war crimes” did Putin commit in Syria? The truth is that he went into Syria to assist the Assad regime in its fight against groups that were committing war crimes, groups such as ISIS and other Salafist groups were running amok, all while the West under Obama stood by and did NOTHING. I might add that the Assad isn’t particularly nice but it is fiercely secular and it gave equal rights to women and religious minorities such as Christians. The fundamental truth is that the West stood by whilst ISIS and other groups butchered Yazidi and Christian boys and men and enslaved Yazidi and Christian girls and women, and it took Russia to step in and assist the Syrian army to liberate those areas captured by ISIS.

    Get help.

  12. Bruce of Newcastle says:

    Mostly agree, but Vlad does seem to have health problems and a drive to achieve lifelong aims. He may be an old man in a hurry.

    The difference is Biden isn’t his own man at all, and the people behind him are much younger but also completely amoral and nutty. At least that means they’re less likely to want to go out with a bang.

    As to Ukrainian democracy, haha. Z is repressing political opponents just as firmly as Poot has been. And as the Dems are working up to do. We’re all going to be living in fascist lefty regimes pretty soon, it seems the way of things.

    (I haven’t watched the video because I can’t stand Piers.)

  13. Buccaneer says:

    If one doesn’t think Biden is a semi coherent bozo who should be in a nursing home, then how does one not interpret his support of regime change in Russia as a nuclear threat particularly after Putin had already alluded to the use of Nuclear weapons himself?

  14. Cassie of Sydney says:

    “(I haven’t watched the video because I can’t stand Piers.)”

    I can’t stand Piers Morgan either but it’s worth watching because Morgan does end up shutting up, and you can see by the end that he agrees with JP.

  15. Terry says:

    you can see by the end that he agrees with JP

    …or, at least not confident to disagree.

  16. Boambee John says:

    Non Mentis

    I might add how many nations has he committed war crimes. Has he committed war crimes against his own people, what about those in Georgia or Syria or now Ukraine?

    Wasn’t Creepy Joe the VP when Shrillary and Obumma between them destroyed Libya and watched while ISIS destroyed Syria?

  17. Terry says:

    Wasn’t Creepy Joe the VP when Shrillary and Obumma between them destroyed Libya and watched while ISIS destroyed Syria?

    Well, yes. But like all committed Leftards, if one cannot remember and doesn’t say, then it never happened!
    #thememoryhole
    #orangemanbad

  18. Not Trampis says:

    Cassie his planes destroyed buildings with people in. That is a war crime.

    I might add Assad killed far more Syrians than Isis ever did. don’t get help get an education.

    bucco we know you have no idea about graphs but you are expanding your areas on no =expertise.
    Regime change could merely mean changing the person in charge.

    It was David Cameron that was congratulated on the regime change in Libya not the USA. He even went there once it occurred.

    Terry obviously doe not remember people rising up against Asaad during the Arab spring. ISIA did not destroy Syria Assad did and would have been far easier to remove if they were successful.

  19. Boambee John says:

    Non Mentis

    It was David Cameron that was congratulated on the regime change in Libya not the USA. He even went there once it occurred.

    It was Shrillary who cackled “We came, we saw, Ghaddafi died”. Was she stealing someone else’s glory (again)?

  20. Mantaray says:

    Not Trampis. (10.04am) That reply reads like early dementia; the second tieme in two posts.

    Biden threatened to use F-15s and nuclear weapons against Americans who might use rifles against HIM. Once again, from the Daily Caller “President Joe Biden argued the Second Amendment is not aimed at allowing Americans to protect themselves from the government Wednesday, saying citizens would need F-15s and nuclear bombs to fight against the U.S. military.”

    Joe is saying directly and openly that guns would not be enough t o overthrow the US govt if it went to armed conflict since HE….. Joe Biden…..has F-15s and Nuclear Weapons to deploy against guns.

    Seriously, you should try Vitamin B-12 injections NT, especially since covid19 gene-jabs definitely hastens it’s onset….https://readementia.com/vitamin-b12-and-dementia/.

    This is NOT mockery, but genuine concern. RUOK?

  21. Buccaneer says:

    Of course Trampis, no one would put together that the US targeting a leader in Libya is somewhat more straight forward than targeting the leader of the largest nuclear arsenal in the world who has threatened to use it.

    Actually, everyone would except you and maybe Joe Biden, is there an urban dictionary term that adds obtuse, lazy gaslighter to Trampis? You could change your moniker to that.

    Still waiting for you to interpret the last graph I posted, oh and get the analysis of the previous ones correct, you never could manage that.

    Oh, and pray tell exactly what do you think might happen if they do target Putin and fail, I’m sure he’d just shake it off and put it down to a learning experience.

    The good thing Trampo though, is that if you ever end up in a court of law and the judge tells the jury that they need to view your actions as those that might have been expected of a reasonable person, your lawyers will be able to bring up all your posts from here as a defence that you’re certifiable.

  22. Not Trampis says:

    Mantaray, try to learn english. pretty easy to understand but you have problems.

    hey graph man, you can advocate a change in leadership without targeting the man. you can even advocate it without having to do anything afterall it is another country.
    Oh and I actually read the graph. There is a reason why the current account is never used back then. and no the USA did not target Gaddaffi.

    Just how are they targeting Putin? you are a nutcase.

    But gop on defending the war criminal.

  23. Boambee John says:

    Non Mentis

    try to learn english.

    A fool who cannot punctuate even a simple sentence tries to claim that others can’t write or read English! ROFLMAO.

    you can advocate a change in leadership without targeting the man.

    So I can advocate for a change in incompetent trolls without targeting the Trampiss?

    no the USA did not target Gaddafi.

    What is so difficult to understand about the slogan: “We came, we saw, Ghaddafi died”? It must clearly mean “long life to you, Colonel”.

    So few sentences in your comment, so much silliness, so many errors, so few facts.

  24. Lee says:

    Wasn’t Creepy Joe the VP when Shrillary and Obumma between them destroyed Libya and watched while ISIS destroyed Syria?

    Hillary’s incompetence actually cost American lives in Benghazi.
    And then she had the gall to try and divert the blame.

  25. and says:

    hey graph man

    Is he related to tamborine man?

  26. and says:

    Waiter, I’d like to order the Word Salad Jumble with the… let me think… with the moral compass dressing. Thanks. And throw in some croutons.

  27. Buccaneer says:

    USA did not target Gaddaffi.

    There were literally NATO airstrikes on the day of his death, of course the US has nothing to do with NATO, not according to the fantasy world you inhabit

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.