-
Latest Posts
- The US confirms it’s inciting world war in the name of sodomy
- Artificial Indignation
- Recusant Christians in the Victorian Liberal Party need a Nick
- Addicting young people to a vice is a venerable business model
- Nazi salute panic is a canting one for luvvies to be propagating
- The face of European “values” still punchable but not as smug
- Historical milestone as IPCC publishes its 1000th final warning
-
Recent Comments
-
TCL Archive
- March 2023 (74)
- February 2023 (84)
- January 2023 (101)
- December 2022 (62)
- November 2022 (72)
- October 2022 (83)
- September 2022 (81)
- August 2022 (82)
- July 2022 (83)
- June 2022 (113)
- May 2022 (80)
- April 2022 (114)
- March 2022 (117)
- February 2022 (120)
- January 2022 (126)
- December 2021 (116)
- November 2021 (112)
- October 2021 (126)
- September 2021 (84)
- August 2021 (6)
-
Post Categories
- Art, music, letters
- Australian police state
- Climate hoax
- COVID
- COVID hysteria
- Culture
- Defence and national security
- Economics and the economy
- Education
- Elections
- Ethics and morality
- Fake conservatism
- Fake news
- Fake science
- Federal politics
- Foreign policy
- Freedom
- General
- History
- Hypocrisy of the left
- Innovation and technology
- International
- Left-wing extremism
- Legal affairs
- Media
- Politics
- Religion and faith
- Rule of law
- Social media
- Sport
- State politics
- US politics
- War and peace
- War on Christianity
- Whatever
-
The Cat Empire
Blogroll
-
Looks like we will find out soon if the Dockers President in Alcock, no balls or not…
Totally agree.
And stop ALL taxpayer funding of so called sport.
Corporate sponsorship of Australian ‘sporting’ organisations is theft from the companies owners.
Corporate sponsorship of Australian ‘sporting’ organisations is theft from the companies owners.
Correct. As a Woodside shareholder I’m good with them withdrawing all sponsorship of anything.
That’s an interesting subject. I guess shareholders want their companies to be well known, sell more stuff and make bigger profits. But they’re also entitled to see a breakdown of the figures to be sure a sponsorship is not a net loser.
As a shareholder in various companies, I don’t mind them sponsoring sport because I like sport. However, if the athletes start spruiking against the company, then I expect them to pull that sponsorship immediately.
Didn’t Carmen Lawrence play for the ‘other’ side?
Did you get to vote on the ‘sport’ that some corporate type decided was best way to promote company?
Not many people go home after watching a Dockers game and think, “I think I’ll buy a shipload of Woodside LNG.”
Similarly after a Diamonds game, “Hey, I need a shipload of Hammersly iron ore.”
Going to be fun when all these woke clubs start going bankrupt. Remember when Rusty saved the Rabbitohs? Sponsors with money don’t grow on trees, and slagging them off is a great way to turn away more than just one or five of them. Not worth the reputational risk.
I doubt many people go home thinking they will join a union or use industry super funds after seeing them on the jerseys of sporting teams either.
No, but like I said, I’m cool with it.
The only “sports” I like are horse racing and pigeons.
I suspect though that the union officials and the industry superfund people rather like using the corporate boxes on the strength of their members’ money.
The thirty thousand Dockers fans who drive their petroleum-powered vehicles to the ground and then watch it under the ten-million-kilowatt lights, obviously have a “different set of values” to the ancient fossils (Dale Kickett excluded) in that offensive photo at the link.
Those swampies can all sod off and glue themselves to a Van Gogh painting someplace if they are so offended, FFS! Why bring this riff-raff to our attention in the first place CL?
A friend from WA told me that, in the aftermath of the Penny Easton affair, people were calling the virulently ex-Catholic Carmen Lawrence ‘our lady of the immaculate deception’.
Stop the support for the ungrateful club (members…….).
As a shareholder I want to know why the hell Woodside supports the team
considering the “cashed up” supporters don’t appreciate the revenue the club shouldnow forgo!
Sounds like “derogatory treatment” to me. It’s high time these businesses started pulling out of sponsorship deals and making moral rights claims.
This one’s a little harder of course – the members are not employees, but it should result in a tightening of agreements moving forward.
Corporate sponsorship is just a tax deductible scam. The company executives get to take their mates to a private box for a free piss up. Shareholders pay for it.