-
Latest Posts
-
Recent Comments
-
TCL Archive
- April 2024 (91)
- March 2024 (115)
- February 2024 (113)
- January 2024 (122)
- December 2023 (89)
- November 2023 (88)
- October 2023 (100)
- September 2023 (84)
- August 2023 (74)
- July 2023 (89)
- June 2023 (81)
- May 2023 (88)
- April 2023 (90)
- March 2023 (118)
- February 2023 (84)
- January 2023 (101)
- December 2022 (62)
- November 2022 (72)
- October 2022 (83)
- September 2022 (81)
- August 2022 (82)
- July 2022 (83)
- June 2022 (113)
- May 2022 (80)
- April 2022 (114)
- March 2022 (117)
- February 2022 (120)
- January 2022 (126)
- December 2021 (116)
- November 2021 (112)
- October 2021 (126)
- September 2021 (84)
- August 2021 (6)
-
Post Categories
- Art, music, letters
- Australian police state
- Climate hoax
- Culture and society
- Defence and national security
- Economics and business
- Education
- Elections
- Ethics and morality
- Fake conservatism
- Fake news
- Fake science
- Federal politics
- Foreign affairs and diplomacy
- General
- History
- International
- Left-wing extremism
- Left-wing hypocrisy
- Legal affairs
- Media
- Politics and governance
- Religion and faith
- Rule of law
- Science and technology
- Social media
- Sport
- State politics
- US politics
- War and peace
- War on Christianity
- Whatever
The ears have it…
Men of the people hahaha
The palpable resentment of the media that it’s the Tories who have delivered the first PM ‘of colour’ is heartwarming. Oh yes, they mention
through gritted teeth that Rishak is the first PM of ‘south asian’ descent, but for people who endlessly, weirdly, obsess about skin colour they are strangely silent in this instance.
I also enjoy their seething that no voters elected Rishak and that he therefore has no mandate. Funny, it didn’t seem to bother them when Julia Gillard was appointed rather than elected to office (twice).
Rishak? Sunak, my apologies.
Prime ministers are always elected, by their MPs.
The electorate never elect a PM. They vote for MPs who then elect their leader. The party that has the most MPs in parliament usually has the leader that becomes PM.
This is a failing of our ‘Westminster System’ of government.
Of course, the Australian Republican Movement could propose to correct these failings, but they don’t (and won’t).
Their only problem with the Monarchy is that they’re not it.
Non Mentis
Prime ministers are always elected, by their MPs.
The electorate never elect a PM. They vote for MPs who then elect their leader. The party that has the most MPs in parliament usually has the leader that becomes PM.
Thanks for the lesson in sucking eggs grandma, but you might like to look up Conservative Party rules, which require a selection of options to be put to party members. In this case, with only one candidate, that was not needed.
Trampis is a tone deaf troll who spends his time trying to derail conversations, in absence of actual argument, it makes him feel better to make pathetic attempts to upset other people. Another reason why no one bothers to comment on his blog.
err the PM is appointed by the King is this stage after an election. MPs elect the leader not part members for either Conservatives or the Labour party.
Party members are used when the PM or Opposition Leader is either challenged or steps down. No members voters here because there was only one person in the race.
It is interesting that both party members have voted for people who were unelectable to the electorate.
Bucco again shows how stupid he is. I actually did not bring up the people electing a PM. I was merely correcting an error. Deplorables make them all the time. Even wg hen they introduce graphs they cannot read!
Right on cue, the Trampis calls me stupid and proves my point at the same time. Not a resident of Crete, the other one.
Yes, Trampo – we’re all AWARE of the technical reality that an Australian Prime Minister and a British Prime Minister are not name-on-a-ballot elected to the office.
We are also aware that, in reality, a general Australian or British election is largely carried by the leader presidentially and the result usually reflects the appeal of that leader. When people say, “Australians voted for Bob Hawke to become PM in 1983,” they are not incorrect.
CL
Please don’t bother Non Mentis with reality, it confuses the poor pre-school failure.
At least Britains can sleep easy knowing there will be no tax cuts nor, Gods Forbid, fracking proposals.
Is that what one does while freezing in the dark?
Maybe the new King could use his weekly meeting with Rishi to advise him on where to go for a suit that will fit him.
At least Charles is well-dressed. Rishi always looks like a teenager after a growth spurt.
That’s what I thought, Roger. Charles is one of the best-dressed men in the world.
By Gieves & Hawkes on Savile Row.