Chloe’s lawyer could be prosecuted in three Australian states

This entry was posted in Culture, Ethics and morality, Left-wing extremism. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Chloe’s lawyer could be prosecuted in three Australian states

  1. C.L. says:

    Posting the Tucker Carlson interview here as well:

  2. Jannie says:

    I couldn’t work out whether that poor woman in the TC interview was a male or female, the testosterone treatment seems to have had an impact, not to mention the breast removal. All I could think was oh you poor human being, how could they do this to you.

  3. Chris M says:

    It’s lawyers that draft these laws, presumably they can sue each other paid by ‘legal aid’.

  4. Dan Andrews will tell you they were only following the science.

  5. Eyrie says:

    Another one of The Mutilated. (see Kurt Schlichter’s latest novel)

  6. Cassie of Sydney says:

    Just remember that before the May election, the Liberal candidate for Warringah, Katherine Deves, was publicly crucified, not just by the left, the MSM and so on, but also by dismal wets in the Liberal Party, Matt Kean, Simon Birmingham and the unlamented wets such as Zimmerman, Martin and Sharma (three who voted against the religious discrimination bill). They called for Deves to be disendorsed? You might ask Deves’ crimes for asking for such a pile on? Well, apart from the fact that Deves helped found an Oz organisation called “Save Women’s Sport”, an organisation set up to prevent biological men with penises competing against biological women, Deves also said that this whole cult of transgenderism (and a cult it is) encourages the mutilation of children and young males and females.

    Deves is 100% right. It is mutilation. How many young adults are going to be mutilated before people wake up?

  7. Petros says:

    Exactly, Cassie. Many of us haven’t forgotten. She stuck her neck out and Scummo, the pretend Christian, threw her under the bus. She only got 40 percent of the vote IIRC. Shows how much Australians care about these issues.

  8. C.L. says:

    Just remember…

    I will never forget, Cassie.

    And the Liberals haven’t changed. IMO, they’re going even harder with the leftist currents. If I see David “Net Zero” Littleproud on Sky one more time being treated like a straight shooter on energy prices, I will throw something at the television. Sky and much of News Corp see their role as nudging conservatives away from immovable principle.

  9. C.L. says:

    All I could think was oh you poor human being, how could they do this to you.

    The how is explicable; the why needs to be stated: they did it to bolster ‘gender’ ideology. They mutilated her to prove a point. They massacred her to get even with conservatives. They “committed surgery” on her (wonderful phrase by Tucker) not to affirm who she was but to affirm the regime-legitimacy of their psychopathic hatreds.

    These are evil people.

  10. Lee says:

    They mutilated her to prove a point. They massacred her to get even with conservatives.

    Same as how abortion has been weaponized by “progressives” to get in the face of those opposed to it, particularly conservatives and Christians.

  11. Terry says:

    ‘not just by the left,… but also by dismal wets in the Liberal Party’

    I think the former covers the latter.
    The “Broad Church” philosophy, in practice, means allowing your enemy to operate with impunity inside your walls. Weakness masquerading as tolerance.

    And the SFL’s continue to wonder why they always lose; refusing to treat the cancer within (even encouraging it to metastasize) and then wondering why you’re unhealthy.

    Tolerance of evil is not a virtue.

  12. Cassie of Sydney says:

    “If I see David “Net Zero” Littleproud on Sky one more time being treated like a straight shooter on energy prices, “

    Yep…me too.

  13. Tel says:

    https://rumble.com/v1sy5wc-the-clifton-duncan-podcast-36-billboard-chris-elston..html

    It’s got ads, but I guess the guy has to earn a living somehow. Anyway, it gives a bit of perspective on how we got here. I’m OK with adults doing weird and experimental things to their bodies but the fundamental point is that children are not ready for informed consent.

    We’ve always known this, but the problem comes down to who can be trusted to act in the best interests of the child? Since our society is going through something of an institutional trust crisis at every level, that’s a hard question. Ultimately the child is going to grow up and live with the consequences, so my argument is that the so called “Precautionary Principle” would require minimum intervention.

    None of the medical “treatments” have a proven track record of long term success, and in many cases the people become more suicidal, or deeply regretful. If in doubt, at least don’t mess things up worse.

  14. Franx says:

    Adults undergoing weird mutilations to their bodies is ok as far as that goes. But to begin with, the delusions which drive the mutilations are imposed as truth about what is a lie, the imposition of the lie capturing not just the deluded but everyone else, in law and in compulsory cultural practice. We are forced to lie endlessly in interactions with persons who have first lied to themselves and then made it compulsory that everyone else is complicit in the lie which rejects essential biological realities (while at the same time falsely assuming one). The issue might be weird, yet it is moreover a great evil, most evidently so now that resistance to it is subject to persecution.

  15. Mantaray says:

    Was just reading a few details about Josef Mengele, and marvelling at how similar his mindset was to the current faddish medicos jumping on the “gender reassignment” bandwagon.

    What’s probably not too well-known is: “Of all the professions in Germany, physicians had the highest ratio of Nazi party membership – 50% to 65% of the physicians in Germany voluntarily joined the Nazi Party; and physicians joined the SS seven times more than teachers or average male employees. But not only physicians who were members of the Nazi party conducted experiments meeting the definition of torture, many non-members did so as well.. (Volker Roelcke, MD, “Academic Medicine During the Nazi Period and Implications for Creating Awareness of Professional Responsibility Today” in Medicine After the Holocaust, 2010)…..

    Hitler’s deputy, Rudolf Hess, coined a popular adage in the Reich, “National Socialism is nothing but applied biology.”

    OK, so we already know that very recently 90% of doctors went along with the injection of health-destroying mRNA/mDNA (bear in mind that DNA is simply 2xRNA), and a similar number would no doubt approve of abortion at 9 months or more, so what’s the big deal (in their putrid minds) about permanently disfiguring and traumatising another few kids that made it past their mRNA syringes and abortion saws? The kids think they are monkeys so we’re gonna sew a tail on them!

    “First; do harm”…the modern medico’s #1 principle!

  16. Petros says:

    The doctors automatically became officers when they joined. Same thing happens in our army and lots of others. They were not front-line cannon fodder, which may also contribute to the over-representation. Regardless, a depressing statistic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *