Magnificent: Dr Grazie Pozo Christie’s 17 Tweets on the war of hatred being waged against girls.
- The US confirms it’s inciting world war in the name of sodomy
- Artificial Indignation
- Recusant Christians in the Victorian Liberal Party need a Nick
- Addicting young people to a vice is a venerable business model
- Nazi salute panic is a canting one for luvvies to be propagating
- The face of European “values” still punchable but not as smug
- Historical milestone as IPCC publishes its 1000th final warning
- March 2023 (74)
- February 2023 (84)
- January 2023 (101)
- December 2022 (62)
- November 2022 (72)
- October 2022 (83)
- September 2022 (81)
- August 2022 (82)
- July 2022 (83)
- June 2022 (113)
- May 2022 (80)
- April 2022 (114)
- March 2022 (117)
- February 2022 (120)
- January 2022 (126)
- December 2021 (116)
- November 2021 (112)
- October 2021 (126)
- September 2021 (84)
- August 2021 (6)
- Art, music, letters
- Australian police state
- Climate hoax
- COVID hysteria
- Defence and national security
- Economics and the economy
- Ethics and morality
- Fake conservatism
- Fake news
- Fake science
- Federal politics
- Foreign policy
- Hypocrisy of the left
- Innovation and technology
- Left-wing extremism
- Legal affairs
- Religion and faith
- Rule of law
- Social media
- State politics
- US politics
- War and peace
- War on Christianity
The Cat Empire
Interesting comment I read today.
I know a girl who is “transitioning” to be a man.
She hasn’t got the faintest idea of how to talk or interact with another bloke.
She just hangs out with the girls and laps up the “OMG, that’s so cool”.
Having read Dr Christies homily, I see why.
This morning I stumbled on a twitter account run by a Scottish girl currently detransitioning, she’s, not surprisingly, very, very angry.
She mentioned that male to females wear womanhood like a costume, I’ve always called it a veneer, but costume is much better.
“She mentioned that male to females wear womanhood like a costume, I’ve always called it a veneer, but costume is much better.”
Correct…it is as offensive and as disparaging as someone putting on blackface. No different.
Particularly utterly revolting are the ones who dress like the most common street tramp, wear the most extreme, garish make-up, and don’t even bother shaving every day, if at all.
What is most puzzling and amazing is the number of women who approve of, or condone men posing as or claiming to be women, including those who invade their spaces.
A little over a month ago I went to a formal dinner in Sydney’s CBD. As I live nearby, I caught the bus home, it was about 10.30 or 11.00 p.m. at night. I was wearing a gorgeous long black Leona dress and some long crystal earings which had cost me quite a bit a few years ago…they weren’t “el cheapo” earings.
When I got on the bus, I sat down and could immediately tell that the person sitting next to me, despite wearing make up, a wig, dressed as women’s clothes and wearing high heel shoes, was a MAN. The first thought that came into my mind was a film from the 1980s, called Dressed to Kill, with Angie Dickinson and Michael Caine, who played a cross-dressing killer. As I sat down, the “person” said to me, in a big blokey voice….”I love your earings”. I turned to HIM, smiled and said nothing. A few stops later, HE got up to get off the bus, I saw clearly that HE was wearing fishnet stockings, a short skirt and HE could barely walk in the high heel shoes so, HE stumbled and nearly fell. And as HE awkwardly got off the bus, I thought of another film….”Some Like it Hot” and the Jack Lemmon character.
His whole attire and demeanour was a parody of women. I found him grotesque.
As grotesque as the creep invited on to Play School to read a story to children.
In a discussion of the “grooming” blow-up on PML last week, Murray demonstrated how conservatives continue to yield to perversions (so as not to be all bible-ly ’n stuff) and thereby yield the entire field of battle to the far left.
Speaking to Bronwyn Bishop, from 2.24 of the video:
“To me, there are plenty of things about the ABC you can have a whack at before you start getting to this.”
Right, Paul. Because normalising cross-dresser fetishists to children (and paying them with the public’s money) is not the hill to die on.
In fact, no hill is ever the hill to die on, is it?
Bishop – who obviously moves in luvvie circles – was weak on the subject but note that, even so, she was then wedged as an extremist hater by Nicholas Reece.
No, Reece, what is “absolutely disgraceful” (and worse) is anyone who thinks that it is appropriate for drag queens to be allowed anywhere near children, let alone “entertaining” them.
Alex Antic is right.
The image conveyed by drag queens makes a mockery of the female sex.
Drag queens portray women as deformed human beings, deformed in their brutal excessiveness. Persons born with the propensities for such excessiveness would be seeking medical attention. And yes, drag queens are a form of grooming. Children, boys and girls, are being deceived and seduced into relating to deformed representations of womanhood and they will be left to struggle with what ensues from such deceptions.
So the drag queens are putting on womanface?
I’m yet to see any gender bender pushers make a distinction between those suffering gender dysphoria and heterosexual men who have a fetish for dressing up like mum and becoming the women they desire. The later are obviously in the girls’ dunnys’ for a thrill (and probably outnumber the former by a considerable margin)
I’m willing to have a whack at their funding and how much of the tax money has been diverted to political causes.
That said, Murdoch and Fairfax also seem able to get a suck on the public sauce bottle via government advertising and little extra boosters.
Ha ha … “vital work”!!!
Lol … “community informed”!!!
This guy is good, it’s the way he tells em.
Look, I’m gonna take the Libertarian position … drag queen story hour is only a problem because the conservatives stood back and allowed taxpayer funding of public libraries.
Every public resource always gets taken over by Leftists … usually for political purposes … when you encourage such a public funded resource, it’s a fair presumption that you wanted that outcome. Complaining about the symptom without considering the cause won’t help much.
Conquest’s second law of politics: “Any organization not explicitly right-wing sooner or later becomes left-wing.”