Red Dawn For Real

NOW we know but, then, we always did. That the 2020 presidential election was corruptly fixed by the Democrat Party, its secret police (the FBI) and Twitter – amongst other willing executioners – is historical fact. The ‘victory’ of Joe Biden is tainted beyond restoration and his ‘administration’ must now be regarded as the most illegitimate in US history. The reaction to the truth on the left over the past several days has been dimwitted denial giving way to childish variations of ‘so what?’ For their part, Swamp-Blob Republicans – who want to return to their legacy vocation of managing the betrayal of principle on behalf of the Chamber of Commerce and lunatic arms manufacturers – chose this moment to push a ‘Trump the loser’ distraction. As though Herschel Walker is a bigger imbecile than Kamala Harris, a more depraved person than Hunter Biden or his loss in Georgia a more consequential proof of bad judgement than the Afghanistan disaster. The Twitter Files are a threat to establishmentarians in both parties and are only one part of the worst political crime ever committed in a contemporary Western democracy. You don’t have to back Donald Trump to know that the Deep State’s brutal invasion of the rule of law in America out-ranks Ukraine and Taiwan as an order of business in 2024. Nothing else comes remotely close.

This entry was posted in Left-wing extremism, Rule of law, US politics. Bookmark the permalink.

82 Responses to Red Dawn For Real

  1. Yank says:

    BJ: I’ll have you know I’m an official FBI bug. You said so!

  2. Buccaneer says:

    The blowfly, upon whom it is now incumbent to prove that none of the cases have evidence. That is your assertion yank, mine is that the outlines you have posted don’t reflect your assertions. That not all of the cases have concluded means your assertion is empty at best and false at worst.

  3. Buccaneer, you are being obtuse. Yank is absolutely correct. If you do not examine any evidence then by definition there is no evidence. End of story. In plain English: Yank is a pathetic troll. Stop feeding him.

  4. Boambee John says:

    Gerry J

    His only skill is to buzz around like a particularly annoying blowfly, spreading shit everywhere. Describing him as a troll is to flatter him.

  5. Buccaneer says:

    We finally got yank to post something that approximates justifying the many empty assertions. Its just that it doesnt actually prove that assertion.

  6. Yank says:

    Chaps: no evidence at all. Not one case at first base. Zip. Zero. Crickets. You’re the ones making stuff up. It didn’t happen. You just don’t like the result. Get over it.

  7. Boambee John says:


    Now we just need to get Non Mentis to post something to support his claims about electricity generation, to demonstrate that he really knows less about that than Yank knows about electoral rorting.

  8. Buccaneer says:

    Even if all these cases ultimately fail, yank asserts that they already have so credibility zero, that won’t be proof of fair and free elections unfettered by fraud. That ship has sailed and the 2020 election will remain tainted by claims (fair or otherwise) that the dems cheated. They had control of both houses and the ability to investigate on their terms but chose not to. One should be rightly skeptical of their actions given the strident claims of russian interference from them after the 2016 election and the subsequent muller investigation.

    Democracy only works if both sides agree each other has a right to govern, we are seeing that agreement dissipate on both sides and that should trouble even a troll like yank.

  9. Buccaneer says:

    BJ, the real trampis won’t publish any evidence, he only has empty assertions. Look at his blog, it’s a ramble of random links from the echo chamber. Even his moniker is a Freudian slip.

  10. Boambee John says:


    I haven’t looked at his blog. Your description does not encourage me to do so, but should I try it anyway?

  11. Yank says:

    Bucco: there is not a single case with evidence. That’s why they are going nowhere. You don’t have any either. You are simply choosing to blame fraud when voters decided against your preference. It is, in your language, a lie.

  12. Buccaneer says:

    Yank, your assertions are empty, you didn’t even read the link you posted. You’ve been posting that 60 of 62 failed. That is obviously not true. Even if it becomes true in the fullness of time that the GOP even needed to go to court rather than there be an actual transparent investigation is the key failure.

    The dems are now dependent on holding power to avoid karma. That is concerning. Democracy depends on there being a viable alternative regardless of your world view. It’s clear that you are part of the cabal trying to marginalise the mechanism by which your own preferred team is held accountable.

  13. Yank says:

    Bucco: that’s all garbage. Show me the evidence. There is none at all. You are simply promoting a lie that is designed to destroy the democratic process. It’s a very old trope that has been used by anti democratic, often evil people down the centuries. Happily the US appears to be able to maintain its integrity.

  14. Boambee John says:


    If there really was no electoral rorting, then the DemonRats and Establishment Republicans missed a great opportunity to destroy Trump and MAGA Republicans.

    They could have convened a Joint Congressional investigation, with MAGA representation on the panel, allowed every complainant to present their evidence. If the evidence turned out to be a nothingburger, then Trump and Co are discredited.

    That they refuse to do this shows that they fear exposure of something unsavoury. But don’t expect them to follow this logic.

  15. Boambee John says:

    PS, what is that expression that our supposed betters use all the time? Oh, yes, “If you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to fear” from their latest intrusive surveillance brain fart.

  16. Buccaneer says:

    BJ is right, not only would a proper investigation showing no electoral interference have destroyed Trump it would have secured the next several electoral cycles for the dems at least. The Russia collusion scandal was apparently so important there needed to be a two year investigation, we now know it was all a fraud. Dems want it both ways, no surprise your incurious yank.

  17. Not Trampis says:

    deplorables are morons.

    no evidence. None
    Why have fraud in the presidential election but not the senate, house and governors elections. Strange eh.
    Fraud is very easy to prove. Dead people cannot vote to take one example. Except the Trump;ists could not even do that.
    Fraud was simply something coup leader and obese President did to make up an excuse why he lost badly.

  18. Buccaneer says:

    Says a person who demonstrates their moron status practically every post. ;;;

  19. Boambee John says:

    Non Mentis

    Why have fraud in the presidential election but not the senate, house and governors elections. Strange eh.

    Already explained, still, it is a bit much to expect a pre-school failure to be able to read.

    Fraud is very easy to prove. Dead people cannot vote to take one example.

    Yet there were multiple examples of them doing so. And the DemonRats adamantly oppose removing them from electoral rolls, because “voter suppression”. Even people who are well over 100 years old seem to be able to vote regularly.

  20. Not Trampis says:

    just so happens courts through out every case alleging fraud.

    Alas for deplorables believing in moronic conspiracy theories again and caught out again.
    Happens all the time

  21. Boambee John says:

    Non Mentis

    just so happens courts through (sic) out every case alleging fraud.

    Perhaps if you were even semi-literate, you would have been able to read the earlier comments about this matter.

    But you failed pre-school. Utterly deplorable!

  22. Yank says:

    Can one of you explain why anyone – courts, congress etc – has evidence to open an inquiry of any kind? There is nothing to look into. No evidence of anything at all. It’s a fiction.
    If you want to see the mood in the US have a look at the Texas gop vote on McDaniels. 62-0 against her retaining the job. Trump and maga dreaming is done.

  23. Buccaneer says:

    Can one of you explain why anyone – courts, congress etc – has evidence to open an inquiry of any kind? There is nothing to look into. No evidence of anything at all. It’s a fiction.

    Didn’t stop them opening the russian collusion investigation. Never stopped dems or the liars party here in the past. Ask Bruce Lehrmann or george pell about evidence…

    The fiction is that anyone examined the evidence to strike out an investigation in the first place, you posted the list of court cased that were funded by various entities, unlike the Muller investigation which was run by the government to benefit the dems.

  24. Yank says:

    Bucco: you seem to get your ideas from that lawyer in The Castle. Bucco wants a congressional inquiry into his “vibe”. In the real world, evidence is required to perhaps show what exactly an inquiry would inquire.

  25. Buccaneer says:

    No one required evidence for the russian collusion enquiry, just a dossier commissioned by a political opponent that the FBI already knew was fake. No one needed evidence of wrong doing for many of the associated prosecutions, just trumped up charges.

    Oh and it’s Denis Denuto, you’re a clown who is hopeless at insults let alone argument.

  26. Boambee John says:

    The desperation not to investigate demonstrates the hidden fear of what might be uncovered. Yet millions were spent to investigate a bogus Steele Dossier, which was a big DemonRat lie.

  27. Yank says:

    Folks: I think you will find that the Russian election interference setup was initially pursued by Barr under Trump. The Russian who was link man has been prosecuted and found guilty. Barr, you see, had evidence. You guys keep howling about the need for inquiry into: what, exactly? What is the evidence that demands attention?

  28. Yank says:

    Bonus: the guy who fed Giuliani has also been identified as a Russian agent and is charged with money laundering. which should see some amusing evidence on property dealings come to light.

  29. Buccaneer says:

    Keep talking yank, you keep revealing how ignorant you are, yes the Trump admin prosecuted the attempts at Russian interference, no they didn’t oppose the investigation into Russian collusion that the dems falsely accused the trump admin of participating in. The abuse of the fbi to do this and the revelations of their actions in the twitter files should see people prosecuted, but they won’t because of people like you who attempt 5his type of misinformation.

  30. Yank says:

    Bucco: evidence is current cases should help us decide your arguments. But given that you don’t like evidence perhaps you will remain on tune.

  31. Boambee John says:


    no they didn’t oppose the investigation into Russian collusion that the dems falsely accused the trump admin of participating in.

    Indeed. A clear case of “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear”. Trump was confident he was innocent. What he didn’t allow for was the reality that the Wussiagate affair was nothing to do with the truth, but simply a DemonRat Lawfare Insurrection, based on dishonesty and corrupt politics.

  32. Buccaneer says:

    Thanks for agreeing with my point at 13 December, 2022 at 10:59 am.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *