What sort of institution would promote chastity in our schools?

8 Responses to What sort of institution would promote chastity in our schools?

1. Buccaneer says:

   31 January, 2023 at 5:56 am

   Unlocks diversity, as long as the girls wear a freedom sack.
2. Christine says:

   31 January, 2023 at 7:27 am

   To the women of the institution, this garb would be quaint-yet-exotic; therefore they gush and fawn
3. Franx says:

   31 January, 2023 at 8:29 am

   What sort of institution would promote chastity, or any other virtue?
   The sort that also promotes principles of inclusion, diversity, respect, spirituality and so on yet which in reality is being deceptive by exploiting these very same principles to further division and animosity between cultural and religious groups. To wit, the journalists and their masters are fully aware that their banal fawning over aspects of Islam has the preferred – indeed desired – effect of alienating groups such as Jews and Christians. Left to their own devices, though, not one of these groups is all that interested in competing with another. But polarise, create division, then ‘cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war’, not to attain justice (nor even miserable revenge) but control.
4. Not Trampis says:

   31 January, 2023 at 11:39 am

   alas promoting chastity does not stop pregnancies. Never has and never will.
5. Christine says:

   31 January, 2023 at 12:09 pm

   Promoting chastity won’t stop all pregnancies; but there would be a reduction in venereal disease. Ask any GP about the numbers of patients now presenting with the various types. Alas .. chastity not cool
6. Franx says:

   31 January, 2023 at 1:01 pm

   I vaguely recall something about Ita Buttrose professing chastity. Or maybe that was celibacy. I think for a while in the celebrity world there was money or maybe a career in it, in talking about it, at least.
7. Boambee John says:

   31 January, 2023 at 2:11 pm

   Non Mentis demonstrates again his total lack of self-awareness. He is incapable of holistic thought, actually of any thought. No wonder he failed pre-school.
8. Old Lefty says:

   31 January, 2023 at 2:41 pm

   I was once taught by a former chairman of HSC history examiners in NSW. He and his colleagues were much amused by a candidate who informed the examiners that ‘population growth in the late eighteenth century was due to the widespread practice of sexual intercourse’. A necessary condition (so the candidate was not strictly speaking wrong) but not a sufficient one, was the examiners’ considered view.

   Even so, our gauche schoolboy examinee obviously grasped a basic fact of biology that has escaped Non Trampis.

   Another of his vignettes was the examinee who tried to mount his Marxist high horse but stumbled over spelling: bourj (crossed out), followed by burge (crossed out), until he finally gave up and wrote ‘middle class’. He is probably a senior professor in one of those degraded institutions that pass for universities these days – or an ABC journalist.