Don’t worry, it’s just military doctors eager to mutilate children

13 Responses to Don’t worry, it’s just military doctors eager to mutilate children

1. jupes says:

   23 March, 2023 at 1:22 pm

   Can anyone still argue that the US are the good guys?
2. Lee says:

   23 March, 2023 at 1:39 pm

   This is pure evil.

   Biden’s America.
3. Cassie of Sydney says:

   23 March, 2023 at 1:41 pm

   And if you object you’re a Nazi.

   Clown world.
4. struth says:

   23 March, 2023 at 1:41 pm

   Yes, the USA are still the good guys.
   The criminals who took over their federal government in a coup, are not representative of that nation….or else they would not have had to steal the election.

   I’m still a good guy, yet my unelected, unconstitutional government are not.
   They are allies to Ukrainian Nazis.
   I am not.

   They are not Australia.
   We are.
5. Eyrie says:

   23 March, 2023 at 1:48 pm

   From where do these people come? Who or what makes them?
6. Fat Tony says:

   23 March, 2023 at 1:53 pm

   From where do these people come? Who or what makes them?

   You know when 2 blokes “try to make a baby”? They’re the result.
7. dover_beach says:

   23 March, 2023 at 1:56 pm

   Pentagon doctors claim 7-year-olds can decide to be injected with hormones, puberty blockers.

   There is no coward’s halfway house or ‘moderate’ position regarding ‘gender-affirming care’. If you argue that it is medically permissible to ‘gender-affirm’ adults then denying this ‘care’ to children would be malpractice. We don’t, for instance, deny chemotherapy to children because, just as we accept the medical liceity of chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer in adults, we do so for children as well. It’s all or nothing.
8. Christine says:

   23 March, 2023 at 2:02 pm

   Still the good guys? Yes, mostly

   There are peculiarities. The people of Massachusetts returned an infamous Kennedy ‘royal’ to the Senate; something hard to fathom.
9. struth says:

   23 March, 2023 at 2:20 pm

   There is no coward’s halfway house or ‘moderate’ position regarding ‘gender-affirming care’. If you argue that it is medically permissible to ‘gender-affirm’ adults then denying this ‘care’ to children would be malpractice. We don’t, for instance, deny chemotherapy to children because, just as we accept the medical liceity of chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer in adults, we do so for children as well. It’s all or nothing.

   What a crock of shit.

   No wonder you get all the morons over there Dover.

   Children are not physically adults.
   Gender affirming adults means treating the male patient different to the female patient as well.
   You can’t cut the knob off a woman, you pillock, and you can’t cut the tits off a child who hasn’t grown any yet.
   You’re a sick puppy.

   Besides the situation regarding being fully responsible only once an adult.
   Kids aren’t mature enough to get a tattoo either, or vote (for what that’s worth)

   Your argument is not only wrong, it’s repulsive.
10. Franx says:

    23 March, 2023 at 6:19 pm

    When mutilations which falsify biological realities are claimed to be ‘care’, it becomes an imperative if not a priority that children, too, must have access to that ‘care’, or rather, to have that ‘care’ imposed upon them. In that sense, then, there is no ‘halfway house’ in relation to the practice of biological mutilations: if it is ‘care’ for adults, biological mutilations are also ‘care’ for children. Essentially, the lies about inauthentic biological realities have been extended to include lies about what constitutes ‘care’.
11. C.L. says:

    23 March, 2023 at 6:38 pm

    Abortion is now also routinely called “abortion care.”
12. Lee says:

    23 March, 2023 at 7:10 pm

    The left is very fond of euphemisms because even it is aware it must try and sugarcoat its enormities.
13. Tel says:

    23 March, 2023 at 7:14 pm

    We don’t, for instance, deny chemotherapy to children …

    Not quite right, the accepted steps of the process are: first you have to be sure that something is genuinely wrong with the child, and be able to empirically measure the problem, then second you need to be very sure chemotherapy really will help, then you go get a second opinion on all this, and possibly a third opinion.

    No one ever simply puts kids on chemotherapy, merely because they feel a little weird going through puberty.

    You don’t go looking for drastic solutions to a problem until you have strong evidence there is a problem.

    In the case of adults, yes we have a number of hypocondriacs who foolishly seek attention or just never can feel quite right … in that case they have responsibility and they have the right to seek whatever care they think best. Perhaps ultimately they do track down what’s wrong, perhaps they don’t. An adult always has more decision making options open than a child … precisely because the adult can take responsibility for the outcome, and the child cannot.