-
Latest Posts
- The new ‘dog ate my homework’
- Politico: Establishment GOP steamrollered in the Golden State
- Let Your Hair Down, Mr Dutton
- The worst and most life-damaging Premier in Australian history
- Francis Sullivan orders bishops to order Catholics how to vote
- Well sonofabitch, Jens Stoltenberg admits NATO started a war
- Tucker on state-run media, the Murdochs, Biden showering with his own daughter and how Barack Obama is still running things
-
Recent Comments
-
TCL Archive
- September 2023 (73)
- August 2023 (74)
- July 2023 (89)
- June 2023 (81)
- May 2023 (88)
- April 2023 (90)
- March 2023 (118)
- February 2023 (84)
- January 2023 (101)
- December 2022 (62)
- November 2022 (72)
- October 2022 (83)
- September 2022 (81)
- August 2022 (82)
- July 2022 (83)
- June 2022 (113)
- May 2022 (80)
- April 2022 (114)
- March 2022 (117)
- February 2022 (120)
- January 2022 (126)
- December 2021 (116)
- November 2021 (112)
- October 2021 (126)
- September 2021 (84)
- August 2021 (6)
-
Post Categories
- Art, music, letters
- Australian police state
- Climate hoax
- Culture
- Defence and national security
- Economics and the economy
- Education
- Elections
- Ethics and morality
- Fake conservatism
- Fake news
- Fake science
- Federal politics
- Foreign policy
- General
- History
- International
- Left-wing extremism
- Left-wing hypocrisy
- Legal affairs
- Media
- Politics
- Religion and faith
- Rule of law
- Science and technology
- Social media
- Sport
- State politics
- US politics
- War and peace
- War on Christianity
- Whatever
-
This would constitute the overthrow of responsible government
This entry was posted in Fake conservatism, Left-wing extremism, Legal affairs. Bookmark the permalink.
Someone wrote this somewhere in the Catallaxy sphere and it shall likely take a lot to convince me it shall turn out otherwise:
My only addendum is that we have three levels of government to which this can be applied. Are the enough aboriginals to fill all the roles?
Are the enough aboriginals to fill all the roles?
Silly man – of course there will be enough “aboriginals” to fil the roles…
The “huge contribution” Aboriginal people have made to the country –
Wyatt is another who won’t say what that is. The interviewers don’t ask.
A guy who was a minister says his people haven’t had a seat at the table and wants to leverage this patent falsehood to ensure his racial group has a greater say than every other racial group.
Did any journalist ask him what he thinks liberal party value might be? He clearly has NFI.
Christine: love they neighbour as thyself. Though I am presuming you are Christian?
If the representatives of the Voice operated simply as do lobbyists then there is no great objection. But if course they won’t. And the High Court might rule that certain guidelines a d practices must be followed. The court might – or might not-take into account that ministerial and responsible government are foundation stones of our system. The court has enormous room to choose.
One particular issue will be whether the Voice Aboriginals get access to documents not available to others, such as Cabinet submissions. Such information is often by itself of commercial value, such as new tax proposals. It could be traded for profit, or used to make profit as does an inside trader.
It’s quite revealing that these people don’t seem to realize that the Voice will be made up of urban aboriginal people who are all Labor supporters.
Thus the Voice will veto anything the Libs try to do, should they ever gain government. As a political coup goes it is right up there with Venezuela. Australia will effectively become a one party state.
They are so hungry for power, they can’t even hold themselves back and act sweet for six months.
This third chamber is attracting exactly the worst people … Wyatt had plenty of opportunity and didn’t achieve much … might be time for someone else’s voice.
These Voice proponents continue to affirm that aboriginals are of lower intelligence than any other group in Australia and need a leg up at every opportunity. This should surely disqualify them from advising any government on anything.
Presumptuous of you, Crusader
You probably love your cat. If he’s a mouser, then he could be considered a contributor. You’ll have evidence of his contributions.
Says the man who had a cabinet seat at the table of a Coalition government.
Also, I’d be interested to know what exactly are the “values” of the Liberal Party and “what it stands for”.
I am sure ADVISEdoes not have the same meaning to Boice advocates as it does to the rest of us
I am sure ADVISEdoes not have the same meaning to Voice advocates as it does to the rest of us
Interesting that the “Voice” activists wish to reintroduce some of the worst aspects of
governance as practised by the invaders of 1788 –
A House of Lords with a power of veto, the membership being inherited; als
The effective creation of Rotten Boroughs where the local Big Men appoint the representatives.
It looks like back to the future for democratic government, and, in practice, a real reduction in the effective value of the vote of the “rank and file” citizen.
These Voice proponents continue to affirm that aboriginals are of lower intelligence than any other group in Australia and need a leg up at every opportunity.Aborigines are just a handy victim group to exploit.
Descendants of Irish slave labourers sent to colonial Australia doesn’t push as many buttons.
This should surely disqualify them from advising any government on anything.
No Ethnic Group should be advising any Australian Government.
Don’t worry, though.
Any Aborigines on The Voice will just be Placeholders, not Decision makers.
Is this the same Wyatt that was subservient to “Professor” Pascoe? Are his qualifications similar to World Championship Wrestling’s Professor Tanaka? Are we supposed to take these people and institutions seriously?
It appeals to my black sense of humor that The Voice will be brought into existence to silence any “other” voices.
I remain slack jawed at the Libs blind refusal to see the two reasons for the Voice: a big new trough for the selected snouts and the end of any power for them.
If you are not in politics to wield power, what’s the point?
Serving up unwatchable tripe, Sarah Ferguson reaffirms my long held conviction that the Coalition’s tolerance of the ABC is a massive own-goal.
Notice her lead-in line? “Ken Wyatt, you resigned from the Liberal Party the day after Peter Dutton came out against the Voice.
Dolts in the Coalition keep this thing alive to what end? What voters do they hope to endear themselves to by keeping it?
FWIW even some of my rusted-on lefty friends can’t stand her.
Crusader
That wasn’t Christine’s question.
But you knew that, you were just trolling.
Grandpa Ed Simpson
What evidence do you have to support your statement that “Any Aborigines on The Voice will just be Placeholders, not Decision makers.”?
I’ll see your Sarah Ferguson and raise you a Patricia Karvelas.
Here’s the point of the ABC:
It raises most of the important issues.
It’s paternalistic to imagine the average Australian can’t see thru PK, Ferguson, O’Brien or any of the scores of talking heads spinning ALP agitprop and draw their own conclusions.
I mean, what are you going to learn watching Netflix?
P.S.
Only see the ABC during their Election Night coverage.
It used to be Leigh Sales or someone presentable.
Never seen [or heard!!] Sarah Ferguson or P.K. on TV before 25th March and the Aston ByElection,
It’s a shock, for sure, we’re being Trolled, but realistically,
It’s kinda funny
Whaddya Whaddya
Who Cares &
8 cents a day.