Ernie Off

This entry was posted in Politics, Whatever. Bookmark the permalink.

37 Responses to Ernie Off

  1. Texas Jack says:

    As support for the Voice drifts off further into the ochre.

  2. C.L. says:

    Good to see you, Jack!

    As the pair continue to argue, 7 News reporter Geofrey Parry asks [WA transport minister Rita] Saffioti what she makes of the dispute.

    “It’s very interesting, because obviously there’s a lot of different Aboriginal groups with history in this area,” she says. “So, um, yeah.”

    So, um, yeah. A fitting epitaph for the Voice.

  3. NFA says:

    They have never been ‘nations’ nor tribes… they were and are family groupings.

    The English could not find anyone to parlay with.

    And if you want to see family groups fight each other then go to Moama, NSW which is just across the river from Echuca, Vic.

  4. Buccaneer says:

    I note the net zero crowd are strangely silent, where are the extinction rebellion people? How long before the glue themselves to a welcome to country rep?

  5. twostix says:

    South Coast NSW when I was a kid they wanted to develop behind a beach, local abo activists found some bones they said and off it went, various families got their noses into it. 20 years it took before a road went in.

    The real story though was white residents and visitors quietly happy the development was blocked and ruined. Not a bad gambit

    Now it’s going australia wide.

  6. Lee says:

    I probably shouldn’t, but I find this hilariously funny and another case of leftist intersectionality gone wrong.

    Aborigines can’t even agree among themselves in their own area, yet the Voice is supposed to solve all.

    Personally, and in any case, I would tell all the superstitious smoking ceremony or welcome to country people to (as the British would say) “sod off!”

  7. Lee says:

    It’s almost as though various aboriginals or groupings thereof are deliberately sabotaging support for the Voice.

    Just like the ones who stopped the farmer or pastoralist from building a small bridge over a creek on his own property because of spiritualistic mumbo jumbo.

  8. Lee says:

    The English could not find anyone to parlay with.

    It’s a funny “First Nation” (or nation, period) that didn’t even have a head, chief or leader.

    Must be a unique “nation” in all of history, which had not the remotest resemblance to a governing body, or any kind of authority.

  9. Lee says:

    Considering the complete absence of aboriginal written records, I’d like to see how competing aboriginal land claims would fare in a court of law.

  10. and says:

    The didgeri-duo add elegance and class to any road opening.

  11. jupes says:

    First of all, that bloke was upset because he was missing out on the money. That was obvious. He calmed down when the nice lady said he could have a cut.

    Secondly, how utterly cringeworthy is it to watch these craven politicians stand over the leaves and try to scoop the smoke onto themselves? The stupid ceremony was probably only invented a few decades ago. Someone should have a laugh and put some tobacco or dope in the fire.

  12. twostix says:

    Secondly, how utterly cringeworthy is it to watch these craven politicians stand over the leaves and try to scoop the smoke onto themselves?

    The absolute state of gen-x though right?

    Holy shit. Didn’t know it was going to be bad.

  13. and says:

    Secondly, how utterly cringeworthy is it to watch these craven politicians stand over the leaves and try to scoop the smoke onto themselves?

    If someone lit up a cigarette, the same “scoopers” would be diving for cover and calling in emergency services.

  14. Lee says:

    If someone lit up a cigarette, the same “scoopers” would be diving for cover and calling in emergency services.

    If someone vaped they would probably have an apoplectic fit.

    Smoking ceremonies are so pagan and prehistoric.

  15. and says:

    ‘Mermaids took him’: Harold Holt disappearance story cited in native title stoush

    Holt disappeared after swimming at a beach near Portsea in 1967. Walton said her grandmother had told her Holt “shouldn’t have been swimming there”.

    Asked by the Bunurong’s lawyer why, Walton told the court: “Well, that is mermaid country. Her belief was that [mermaids] took him.”

    Walton said identifying as Indigenous was important to her. “There’s an obligation for Indigenous owners to Country and culture,” she said.
    RTWT

    https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/mermaids-took-him-harold-holt-disappearance-story-cited-in-native-title-stoush-20230707-p5dmjk.html

  16. and says:

    A race to the bottom.

    Are we there yet?

  17. twostix says:

    a native title application from the Boon Wurrung Land and Sea Council covering 13,000 square kilometres along Victoria’s coast.

    Bunurong group witnesses – including Walton, who is married to entertainer Rove McManus and lives on the Mornington Peninsula – responded in the Federal Court on Monday to the expert evidence that raised questions over their claimed ancestry.

    This is a modern enclosure act movement. The wanabee aristocracy are using their control of the system and courts, corrupting private property law to seize huge chunks of the country.

  18. Christine says:

    If this “recognition” is lost forever, then Burney will just have to be satisfied with the recognition they already have. I’m not pretending to care.
    Lost forever? so be it

    It’s too much – these ridiculous individuals bending down to receive the smoke. Nitwittery.

  19. twostix says:

    Linda Burney has warned Australians could lose their best chance to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in the Constitution if they vote No, pointing to the failed 1999 republic referendum as a cautionary tale

    Sad.

    Funny how suddenly everyone pretends to care about the constitution after three years of mocking anyone quoting the bits that limit power.

  20. Tel says:

    Keep running boys! I saw the goal posts heading over that hill over there … we almost got em.

    A race to the bottom.

    Are we there yet?

    No … keep going … FORWARDS!!!

  21. Boambee John says:

    Mermaids?

    I am beginning to think that a bunch of latter day Ernie Dingos are competing to see which can get the most ludicrous tale recognised by the politically correct politicians, media and courts in Australia.

  22. rosie says:

    They are competing for the right to lodge native title claims.
    Both lots ought to fail.
    Sealers stole Aboriginal women from various mainland sites, as well as Tasmania. That’s well established.
    There is sufficient information to more or less identify about four of the women taken from Point Nepean.
    Various attempts to rescue women stolen by sealers failed, either they couldn’t be found or refused to be rescued. This all happened in the early 1830s.
    Some of them were taken on to Albany in Western Australia.
    None of them appeared to have lived traditional lifestyles, how could they have? and their connection to country seems to have been severed at that point, in many cases voluntarily when offers to take them back to their tribes were refused.
    A continuous and unbroken connection?

    Generally claimants must provide evidence of a continuous system of law and custom that gives rights to the land, and that this has been handed down from generation to generation since before colonisation.

    It doesn’t seem likely.
    Not to mention the Mornington Peninsula claims also appear to overlap claims by yet another two distinct and well established tribal groups, the Kurnai of Gippsland and Melbourne’s Wurundjeri.

  23. Wally Dalí says:

    WA Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act has anticipated trouble with recurring strife between competing “Native Title*” claims- it will create corporatised Land Councils, whose jurisdictions will not overlap and who will reign unchallenged whithin their booyahs.
    *Yes, “cultural heritage” is title. It will enable the land council controllers to extract rent and direct development, as well as the cash cow smoking ceremony welcome to country routine.

  24. cuckoo says:

    The organisation I work for (Victoria, public service) used to have an acknowledgment of country which mentioned the wurundjeri and woi-wurrung. Then from one day to the next it changed to a generic statement about elders and ancestors. When I queried this, it was explained in vague terms as a result of recent ‘discussions’. Presumably complaints from the various indigenous families, bitterly warring for government largesse, who make up the state’s rich aboriginal tapestry.

  25. Christine says:

    “explained in vague terms”

    Pearson claimed the country owes its success to Aboriginal foundation (customs/culture); that’s fairly vague.
    A woman named Teely declared that Aboriginal people built the nation; but didn’t say what was actually built. Vague-ish.
    The present cricket captain was quite vague when he said Australians know about the achievements of the Egyptians but not those of the Aboriginal people; he didn’t say what these achievements were.
    And the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs – relentlessly vague.

  26. NFA says:

    And we are presented with the Vague Voice ™.

    I wonder who gets to count the referendum ‘votes’!

  27. Fat Tony says:

    I wonder who gets to count the referendum ‘votes’!

    That is my big concern.

    And also the referendum being done by mail-in ballots – would that be legal?

  28. NFA says:

    This is a link to a twitter post that contains a video of Teela Reid with a Voice.

    from the preamble on the twit

    Meet Teela Reid… the high-profile Voice campaigner, Uluru Dialogue leader and member of Anthony Albanese’s Voice Referendum Engagement Group.

    She’s fighting to “abolish Australia Day” and says the Voice is about “the fight for…compensation and reparations”.

    According to Teela Reid, the Voice is about “demolishing” what she calls “systems of oppression”, and would be so powerful it would be “very difficult for a government to ignore”.

    Every Australian needs to hear directly from this important architect of the Voice to Parliament.

  29. NFA says:

    Fat Tony

    the referendum being done by mail-in ballots – would that be legal?

    Check the AEC – General Postal Voters

  30. and says:

    Yeah, right.


    Noel Pearson urges Queenslanders to treat voice referendum as ‘the ultimate State of Origin’

    https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jul/10/noel-pearson-urges-queenslanders-to-treat-voice-referendum-as-the-ultimate-state-of-origin

  31. Texas Jack says:

    Noel Pearson urges Queenslanders to treat voice referendum as ‘the ultimate State of Origin’

    I’m not the least bit worried about the referendum. Not while Noel Pearson continues his various attempts to rally support.

  32. Boambee John says:

    According to Teela Reid, the Voice is about “demolishing” what she calls “systems of oppression”, and would be so powerful it would be “very difficult for a government to ignore”.

    No, no, no, that’s impossible. Turd Case has assured us that the Voice will have no real power. Alongside his genius, what would that aboriginal woman know.

  33. Lee says:

    The present cricket captain was quite vague when he said Australians know about the achievements of the Egyptians but not those of the Aboriginal people; he didn’t say what these achievements were.

    LOL.

    Cummins is a moron and a product of our e̶d̶u̶c̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ propaganda system.

  34. Lee says:

    The only enemies he’s made are conservatives.
    But I suppose that’s what you mean.

    Pesutto is despised by conservatives and those on the right here in Victoria.

    The only reason the left don’t despise him more is because they recognise that the Labor-lite Pesutto is absolutely no threat to them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *