At Nuremberg, he would have been lucky to escape the gallows

Killing unborn children is necessary to preserve the wehrmacht, says defender of our ‘values’:

This entry was posted in Ethics and morality, Left-wing extremism. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to At Nuremberg, he would have been lucky to escape the gallows

  1. calli says:

    Shorter BugmanSpeak – you sign up, fall pregnant – we procure an abortion for you. So you can serve (and perhaps die) with “dignity”.

    The child, of course, has already paid the ultimate price. With the dignity of a curette and a kidney dish.

    Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.

  2. C.L. says:

    From the transcript:

    And so what happens if you get assigned to a state like Alabama, which has a pretty restrictive abortion law in place, and you’re concerned about your reproductive care? What do you do?

    Do you say no and get out? Well, some people may decide to do that. And what does that mean? That means we lose talent, important talent. And we’re, again, an all-volunteer force. Recruiting is tough enough as it is with a very strong economy out there.

    We want to keep the people that we get.

    Brings this to mind.

  3. RacerX says:

    and you’re concerned about your reproductive care? What do you do?

    My advice would be to research what causes pregnancy, methods and products available to prevent pregnancy and then make wise decisions based on that knowledge.

  4. Franx says:

    Child-bearing is prohibited in the services, correct?
    Or is mother-and child also a part of the promise to women in the forces? On frontlines?

  5. Buccaneer says:

    The child, of course, has already paid the ultimate price. With the dignity of a curette and a kidney dish.

    Or if the pregnancy has progressed long enough and the critter has the temerity to come out alive, a pair of chicken shears with a less comfortable grip ala Kermit Gosnell.

  6. jupes says:

    Child-bearing is prohibited in the services, correct?

    No. The ADF even has pregnancy uniforms.

    Or is mother-and child also a part of the promise to women in the forces? On frontlines?

    Pregnant ‘soldiers’ are not allowed to serve on ‘frontlines’. They get sent home.

  7. jupes says:

    Also from the transcript:

    … whether they’re about transgender individuals who qualify physically and mentally to serve, to be able to do it with dignity,

    Trannies qualify “mentally” to serve, and they do it with dignity. Clown world.

  8. Franx says:

    Pregnant ‘soldiers’ are not allowed to serve on ‘frontlines’. They get sent home

    .

    Clearly, I am confused about all this, because I forgot that according to the WHO, ‘pregnancy tissue’ should be treated just as any other biological material, irrespective of gestational stage, including the final stage of passage down the birth canal. In a sense, then, pregnancy is a delusion, unless the woman says – and has the right to say – that she has reason to favour the biological material.

  9. Jannie says:

    Trying to get my head around the term “reproductive care”. Next time I have to explain the meaning of the word ‘oxymoron’, I will use it.

  10. jupes says:

    Trying to get my head around the term “reproductive care”.

    Reproductive care – killing children.
    Gender affirming care – mutilating children.

    Orwell is the prophet of our age.

  11. Rabz says:

    These people are insane and they are handing the West on a platter to tyrants.

    Great work and thanks a bunch, you preposterous knobheads.

  12. Mantaray says:

    Jupes (9.15am). Lily-white Tranny in the ADF “We are now going to face the invading Chinese? I identify as a sheila, and as Chinese.” Then throws down rifle, or maybe turns weapon on nearest ADF troops.

    IF there’s some sort of capture and court-martial “It’s against my human rights, and Inclusion / diversity principles to prosecute me. This war against us Asians is racist”

    Case dismissed!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *