The superintendent at the scene told [Lyle] Shelton to get a security guard there as soon as possible, because they would clear the crime scene by 2am, a highly unusual practice in an arson case.
Police concluded it was just a random suicide attempt, and nothing to do with ACL, based on a seven or eight minute interview with the alleged driver in the emergency ward the next morning.
That was Miranda Devine for the Daily Telegraph on 1 January, 2017. Her incredulity was justified. In February this year, I explained how Andrew Colvin and the AFP steam-cleaned the narrative of an anti-Christian terrorist attack committed by a homosexual fanatic. The priority was to sandbag the political left generally and the gay lobby specifically. It’s no surprise that Mr Colvin – now a big shot at woke Deloitte – sprang into action to save another of the left’s false and idiotic story lines. Like Brittany, alas, the ex-emperor is starkers.
Naturally the ACL HQ bomber would claim he was just attempting to commit suicide, so as to avoid terrorism charges if he survived.
The K̶e̶y̶s̶t̶o̶n̶e̶ Canberra cops must be as dumb as a box of rocks.
That, or covering up the real motive for the explosion for political or ideological reasons.
The kanbra kops were run by a bloke that the Australian mafia got rid of and then spent years pursuing the bloke they reckoned did it.
Why would the mafia want to kill the boss of kanbra kops?
Staff at Parliament House were told not to clean Reynolds Office and to contact the AFP about Higgins being naked in the office.
Both directions were ignored and the Executive Summary of the Incident was altered.
Coverup and whitewashh followed.
The Cops are only there to protect criminals.
Prior to the introduction of Police, Criminals were hanged.
Afterwards, they went on to sire large families.
That’s been happenin for 6 Generations now.
Ed Case… the ‘Insight Knowledge’.
Australian Labor, without U, Party grandees.
A woman was found on a couch minus her dress, which was all she’d been wearing.
A crime must’ve been committed?
The woman walks away from the premises, evidently mute. Madam had her opportunity to report the “crime”. That’s what victims are advised to do.
Anyway, it all worked out quite well for her.
The woman walks away from the premises, evidently mute. Madam had her opportunity to report the “crime”. That’s what victims are advised to do.
Seriously?
Report it within a coupla hours or you’re a liar?
Anyway, it all worked out quite well for her.
Huh?
She had a nervous breakdown, she’s been publicly shamed and is unemployable because of it.
Unemployable, except at their UN.
Laugh out loud Ed Coke.
Turd Case again defends his favourite niece. Will she give him chocolates or champagne this Christmas?
Holiday snaps show her looking utterly unashamed.
Triumphant.
It worked out exceedingly well for her.
Couldn’t have worked out better if she’d planned it.
The only coverup was to save Gallagher blushes for coaching the alleged victim. Higgins by her own account didn’t make a formal complaint until later. Strange how said unemployable person was able to study and gain employment all while the case was on.
She should be unemployable after the lies that we’re uncovered in court.
In the BH alleged sequence of events: did the dress come off before, during or after.
‘Its a long way to the couch when your on a roll’.
Ahem … “were told” … errr … told by whom? The verb “told” does not exist in the passive form, it requires a conscious decision, by someone.
Directions now … under what authority? Who exactly has the authority to decide when a Minister should clean her sofa?
You aren’t making shit up again, I hope.
Who exactly has the authority to decide when a Minister should clean her sofa?
You’re suggesting Ministers should hire and supervise The Cleaners?
Is that another Libertarian idea of yours?
I think the version now generally accepted (per the Sofronoff inquiry) is that Higgins was partially naked, in that her dress was pulled up. Not that this issue is of much if any sigpnificance.
The Inquiry report is due next week. Perhaps some excitement in the media will follow. Drumgold, Yates and Wilkinson might get a drubbing. Reynolds might be happy with what is said about Drumgold’s treatment of Fiona Brown.
Anyway… what appalls me here is Maiden’s use of Colvin as an authority on painstaking policing. The ACL bombing occurred at 9.30 p.m. on 21 December 2016. The AFP’s official statement claiming it was just a ‘suicide attempt’ was reported by the ABC at 5.43 a.m. the next day. This was an officially curated lie.
C.L.
The kanbra kops are all for ‘the current vibe’.
The ASL bombing was a terrorist attack, whichever way anyone wishes to ‘dice’ it.
The perpetrator was disappeared!
Thanks, Rafiki.
Different, then, from ‘completely naked’ and in foetal position, as at trial. I asked as I wondered how the dress had remained intact and could be worn again, no split seams, no tears, e.g.
It appears it wasn’t just Barnaby without the baby, it was Profumo without the penetration too..
“what appalls me here is Maiden’s use of Colvin as an authority on painstaking policing.”
I regard Samantha Maiden as an appalling journalist. She was also involved in the Porter bulldust.
He must have had Hugh Massingberg-Massingberg as his defence barrister. Although he is a dab hand at the prosecution too!
As usual, Danistan led the way. There are at least thirteen unsolved cases of arson attacks on churches in and around Melbourne; there may well be others not reported in the media. Victoria’s intrepid constabulary, have, however, solved one: a case involving a serial firebug who also tried to torch a police station. No trouble finding him!
Certain crimes seem never to be investigated, let alone punished.I dont believe anyone was ever arrested let alone charged over Bolt’s assault although I am sure it had utmost priority.
It appeared pretty stage managed to me.
Where was Security, you wouldn’t have a Book Launch fin Melbourne featuring Andrew Bolt without some level of security.
Ed, avoider of evidence and purveyor of fiction thinks folk here pay attention to what he thinks. Quaint!
Executive power, and ministerial responsibility are the core tradition of the Westminster System … which the Australian Commonwealth is based on.
Now you might need to activate three or four extra braincells here but the work can be delegated, just as it is in every large organization … and yet ministerial responsibility is not diluted, because ultimately the buck needs to stop somewhere. Read it over a few times slowly if that helps … but try to get your head around it.
As you already no doubt understand, the government of Australia was not exactly designed around Libertarian principles, although perhaps their are hints of it in the Constitution of Australia if you want to go searching. That’s irrelevant though, in as much as the ideas of responsibility and delegation apply to all systems, even central planning. You of course want to goof off and somehow link things back to Libertarians in the hope that it makes you sound hip … just to explain this to you, people don’t see that as clever, actually is makes come across as ignorant, and a bit thick.
Besides that, you regolarly avoid answering specific questions … so I’ll ask again.
Who in particular told the staff at Parliament House not to clean Reynolds Office, and using what authority?
If you want to sound smart, try answering the question instead of launching yet another distraction. Go on Ed, try to address the issue.
Tl;dr:
Another Libertarian brainfart, then.
If you watched the video you would have seen Bolt was walking down a street.
No, he wasn’t.
There was a marquee outside the bookshop with tables and chairs, Bolt exited the shop and that’s where the altercation took place.
Where was everyone else from the launch?
It doesn’t pass the sniff test.
Ed is on ‘the Bolt Case’.
Do you think he’s a paid up member of actors equity Ed?
Speaking of “clean outs”,
Robodebt bureaucrat Kathryn Campbell resigns from $900,000 Defence job
Ed sniffing stuff again, you don’t have enough sensibility to waste it on that stuff Ed.
Oh dear… this seems to be some excerpts from
Her book: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12313803/amp/Brittany-Higgins-compared-Tibetan-monks-set-fire-leaked-outline-325-000-book.html
Brittany, the ultimate “victim.”
Brittany Higgins compared her fight against the ‘patriarchy’ in Parliament House to the Tibetan monks who self-immolated during the Vietnam War.
Higgins didn’t pen that howler, though.
That was a Vietnamese Buddhist Monk in Saigon, from memory.
Tibet was under Chinese Rule at the time, they weren’t allowing self immolations and Tibetan Buddhists had no dog in that fight anyway.
What substance are you abusing this time Ed, that post makes even less sense than you normally make.
Turd Case
If “Higgins didn’t pen that howler” in the draft outline of her book, who did? The same person who wrote the fantasy story she told the Cane Toad?
Skidmaek:
Do your carers a favor.
Go play in traffic.
Considering all she’s supposedly endured, a parent might’ve advised her against going down the book path. Caught out in many lies, Brittany will be struggling to persuade readers (who are still curious) that she’s a warrior and not a schemer.
First hearing of this incident, I imagined a vulnerable, young employee had been sexually assaulted by a superior/possibly senior male.
But no, actually a case of two practised, entitled, young employees, sauntering into Parliament House in the early hours, for some time alone.
Although they’re the same age Lehrmann was a Senior Adviser to Reynolds.
If hne coulda hung on another 88 days, he woulda been Senior Adviser to the Defence Minister.
… persuade readers (who are still curious) …
Just my opinion:
It will be a Best Seller, bigger than Niki Savva’s The Road To Ruin.
Turd Case
Bigger than Nikki Savva’s unread tome? Are you expecting it to sell ten copies? LOL.
People, please refer to other commenters by their preferred name.
OK.
I do my best to adhere to this C.L.
But I occasionally fall!
CL likes to see evidence destroyed when it suits his prejudices.
Nix
Please translate. What evidence are you babbling about?