Steel Ceiling

Yes to quotas for women in the law and academe. A maximum of five and 20 per cent respectively.

This entry was posted in Left-wing extremism, Rule of law. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Steel Ceiling

  1. C.L. says:

    Thanks to Old Lefty for another example of a feminist who hates the presumption of innocence.

  2. NFA says:

    Common Law is virtually gone>

    ‘Woke Law’ is The Law!

  3. Boxcar says:

    See female Doctor.
    Assume ANU professor
    Move on

  4. MatrixTransform says:

    I blame their fathers

    yr problem ya silly bint, is that you blame everybody except yourself

    nobody cares about the noise in your head.

  5. Bushkid says:

    Goodness me!

    My failed masculinity is on show again… and I’m a woman.

    I’m no fan of Russel Brand, but I’m heartily sick of this accuse a man years after the event, but do so in the media without making a complaint to police habit.

  6. C.L. says:

    Until Western feminists march to shut down abortion clinics, I have no intention of taking any of their pseudo-ethical utterances seriously.

  7. Lee says:

    Price is a particularly repellent #MeToo dinosaur.

    So much for innocent until proven guilty.

  8. Lee says:

    Did Price ever have anything critical to say about Brand before he turned against the leftist or woke paradigm?

    I thought not.

  9. Christine says:

    I think it’s more than “a bunch”.
    Good she’s upset.

  10. Old Lefty says:

    Exactly right, Lee @8.26pm.

  11. Jannie says:

    The presumption of innocence and the burden of proof is an ancient right, back to Roman and Jewish law. Rumpole of the Bailey called it the “Golden Thread” of common law.

    But anyway, these are anonymous allegations, no charges of law involved, yet.

    Still they punish first and ask no questions. Dystopia, jungle law.

  12. Entropy says:

    Left is always guilty of what they accuse others.

  13. Riversutra says:

    I think some here are confused about Brands issues being about the law.
    The Law has nothing to do with it.
    The Process (banning, bad mouthing, anonymous accusations etc etc) is the punishment.
    No need to mess about with an actual court case.
    This is now standard progressive playbook because it works.
    He’ll never get reputation or lost income back.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *