This 2070-word attempt by Greg Craven to win over “you guys” is so condescending it’s amusing.
-
Latest Posts
- The Suddenly Orphaned War
- Destined for sculpted immortality, legends do what they do best
- Tingle: Anti-Semitism overblown, Hamas-lovers the real victims
- Conquered
- The Cohen Admonition
- Aussie deep state still getting the hang of rigging a prosecution
- The ABC lionises terrorist cockroach and his depraved mother
-
Recent Comments
-
TCL Archive
- December 2023 (5)
- November 2023 (88)
- October 2023 (100)
- September 2023 (84)
- August 2023 (74)
- July 2023 (89)
- June 2023 (81)
- May 2023 (88)
- April 2023 (90)
- March 2023 (118)
- February 2023 (84)
- January 2023 (101)
- December 2022 (62)
- November 2022 (72)
- October 2022 (83)
- September 2022 (81)
- August 2022 (82)
- July 2022 (83)
- June 2022 (113)
- May 2022 (80)
- April 2022 (114)
- March 2022 (117)
- February 2022 (120)
- January 2022 (126)
- December 2021 (116)
- November 2021 (112)
- October 2021 (126)
- September 2021 (84)
- August 2021 (6)
-
Post Categories
- Art, music, letters
- Australian police state
- Climate hoax
- Culture
- Defence and national security
- Economics and the economy
- Education
- Elections
- Ethics and morality
- Fake conservatism
- Fake news
- Fake science
- Federal politics
- Foreign policy
- General
- History
- International
- Left-wing extremism
- Left-wing hypocrisy
- Legal affairs
- Media
- Politics
- Religion and faith
- Rule of law
- Science and technology
- Social media
- Sport
- State politics
- US politics
- War and peace
- War on Christianity
- Whatever
Maybe a Freudian slip by Craven about yes media campaign being jingoistic.
The referendum is sounding a bit like what I think used to be ‘Saturday night live’ or something. Kamahl and Dicky Knee, one saying unkind things, the other asking why people were so unkind.
I disagree with Craven; Burney doesn’t deserve forgiveness, because as far as I am aware she has not shown the least sign of contrition for her accusation.
Stali Zvengall & Coochee Gucci Goo
https://twitter.com/LindaBurneyMP/status/1705859456083579021
Newspoll: voice support slips again to 36pc.
Stali and Coochee
(brought to you by the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs)
horrible and ghastly
Note the lie about funding.
$4.5billion is for just one of the many aboriginal agencies but MacDonald pretends it is the total spend.
Some fact check!
Craven falling apart.
Ignorant and overwrought.
What could Kamahl be up to; inserting himself into the tussle as a YeahNah man. Seriously flippant .. or what?
An understated flourish, sure to aggravate.
On the question whether the Voice could be enacted by legislation: yes, it can, but a complication is that it would contradict the equality before the law principle stated in section 10 of the Racial Discrimination Act. To avoid complications, the Voice law would need to override s 10 explicitly. This would not be a good look and would put Australia in breach of its obligations under the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (not sure of title), article 5 of which is the basis for s 10 of the RD Act. (Of course, proposed s 129 of the Constitution also puts us in breach).
which one is the Aboriginal?
Which one is the aboriginal?
It’s inner city Sydney, so must be the blond, surely?
Craven the professional ethicist was sooo sure he was going to be on the right side of history, he chose to throw all his principles aside and contrived to vote Yes regardless of all the problems he could see. Now he’s painted himself into a corner and his latest long diatribe is both an exercise in self justification and a desperate attempt to change the trajectory.
Never has a man been so aptly named.
So many yessers have said to me that if it’s not in the constitution it could be abolished “with the stroke of a pen”. Remind me of the last time an incoming Coalition government even threatened to do something like this? What happened when Tony Abbott attempted the most modest tweak to Medicare in the form of a tiny co-payment? The outrage was such that he had to back down. So yes, keep imagining these future bloodstained Genghis Khan liberals abolishing things with the stroke of pen.
Well Howard did sack ATSIC like a State Government sacking a corrupt local council.
Which is one of the reasons why of course back in the day there was a try on to put local government in the constitution. The other being for the Feds to engage directly with Local Government rather than the states. Which they found a way to do anyway.
Entropy at 12:13 pm
was the communist constitutional Craven involved with this?
I want to know what Constitutional Law communist Craven has been involved with over the years.