-
Latest Posts
- The Suddenly Orphaned War
- Destined for sculpted immortality, legends do what they do best
- Tingle: Anti-Semitism overblown, Hamas-lovers the real victims
- Conquered
- The Cohen Admonition
- Aussie deep state still getting the hang of rigging a prosecution
- The ABC lionises terrorist cockroach and his depraved mother
-
Recent Comments
-
TCL Archive
- December 2023 (5)
- November 2023 (88)
- October 2023 (100)
- September 2023 (84)
- August 2023 (74)
- July 2023 (89)
- June 2023 (81)
- May 2023 (88)
- April 2023 (90)
- March 2023 (118)
- February 2023 (84)
- January 2023 (101)
- December 2022 (62)
- November 2022 (72)
- October 2022 (83)
- September 2022 (81)
- August 2022 (82)
- July 2022 (83)
- June 2022 (113)
- May 2022 (80)
- April 2022 (114)
- March 2022 (117)
- February 2022 (120)
- January 2022 (126)
- December 2021 (116)
- November 2021 (112)
- October 2021 (126)
- September 2021 (84)
- August 2021 (6)
-
Post Categories
- Art, music, letters
- Australian police state
- Climate hoax
- Culture
- Defence and national security
- Economics and the economy
- Education
- Elections
- Ethics and morality
- Fake conservatism
- Fake news
- Fake science
- Federal politics
- Foreign policy
- General
- History
- International
- Left-wing extremism
- Left-wing hypocrisy
- Legal affairs
- Media
- Politics
- Religion and faith
- Rule of law
- Science and technology
- Social media
- Sport
- State politics
- US politics
- War and peace
- War on Christianity
- Whatever
Subheading:
Andrew Barr = top politician = long bow.
Outside of the Canberra bubble, 97.3% of Australians have never heard of the swine.
A little too grim, NFA, my friend – but I get it.
I thought that Dan Andrews and his government were terrible, but even he would not condone or support terrorist attacks on Israel, like ACT and Green scum.
I was under the probably mistaken impression that Hamas was a proscribed organisation in Australia.
No probs… but he is one of the greatest scum, barr none.
ASIO are too busy watching ‘right wing’ Catholics.
Surprised the MSM aren’t calling the muslim’s actions ‘post-birth abortions.’ One’s done in the open, the other is done in a (sterile) room with medically trained persons.
Hasn’t anyone told Gay Barr what Hamas do to queers when the Western luvvie media aren’t looking?
David Pocock seems very quiet about Hamas
Baby beheadings = Ghost of Kiev = Syrian chemical weapons = babies in incubators being tipped out on the floor in Iraq.
If Israel keeps encouraging the peddling of made up atrocity porn by the western yellow media for cheap consumption by the bored, gore enamoured, abortionist loving, godless, largely impotent western populace, the care factor for the war by the same will go to zero in a month. As it did Ukraine when they did exactly the same thing (does nobody remember?). And, judging by history of every US puppet state over the last 30 years who have played the same US state dept. playbook, they will ultimately lose.
Need to be more sober, supporters need to be more critical or it’s already lost.
As with reports of news about ‘news’ and news of ‘accounts’ – in the linked articles – so with the globalists’ s coordinated lighting up of buildings in an attempt to bind and blind.
I’m pretty sure Hamas did indeed murder upwards of 1200 men, women, children and babies. I don’t think that’s made up.
The difference with Ukraine is that nothing that happened there has been seen or filmed. It is the most redacted war since the 18th century.
The reporting of what is known is one thing; the reporting of news that there has been ‘news’ of babies being beheaded is something else, almost as if it were not enough that babies were caught up in killing sprees.
Whatever is Ukraine, it is not a killing spree perpetrated by frenzied escapees from behind barbed wire and concrete walls.
True CL, but given the provenance of the original reports, the 40 beheaded babies story is almost certainly a fabrication.
Not that it matters now. It is accepted truth, confirmed by the President of the United States.
It’s not much of an argument, to be honest.
‘Sure, Hamas killed men, women, children and babies in kibbutzes (and elsewhere) but, look, the figure 40 popped into the narrative without IDF authorisation – which means Hamas is being given an unfair rap.’
The number was not “fabricated.” It derived from what a journalist in situ at Kfar Aza – Nicole Zedek – reported about beheadings and the number of children she was told had been taken away in body bags. The conflation – if it was conflation – was done by Twitterers. If she was less than perfectly accurate in her description of events – surrounded as she and other reporters were by dead bodies – I’m not chastising her for it.
There is a species of fake news which seeks to disestablish substantive truth with quibbling – and this is a specialty of Paliwood and the left.
The journalist in situ was also aware that even while she was speaking the population of nearby Gaza was being shelled. It is not conscionable that the population of Gaza is attacked as a way of retaliating against Hamas atrocities, unless it is believed that Gaza itself is the perpetrator of the atrocities against Israeli citizens, for then, and without the sounds accompanying any shelling, there is the silent justification of turning off water and electricity.
The story of beheaded babies in Kfar Aza originated from one source:
1/5 I’m getting a lot of question about the reports of “Hamas beheaded babies” that were published after the media tour in the village. During the tour we didn’t see any evidence of this, and the army spokesperson or commanders also didn’t mention any such incidents.
As I just said.
I didn’t claim the journalist fabricated the story.
The ‘how the babies died’ quibble – beheaded or shot in the head – is classic leftist misdirection. Not from you – but that’s what it is.
Countless media outlets quoted an Israeli army major saying babies had been beheaded at a kibbutz. Astonishingly, some commentators argued they’d been shot rather than decapitated. To any sane person, such a debate is an abomination.
Indeed.
And Albo and his Barr mate are still scum!
What NFA said.
Hypothetical exculpatory comment: “So, you’re saying that the babies were shot, not decapitated? Okay, we should cut slack for Hamas in that case.”
This lie cannot be attributed to the fog of war. All lies are told for a purpose. What was the purpose of this lie?
Fogs, conspiracy. People are dead.
The journalist in situ made a point of referring to beheadings. Why would she – given that for most people, there is indeed a difference between gunning children down and beheading them, which is not to say,
Okay, we should cut slack for Hamas in that case.
Thus in either case, whether claiming a difference or not, the lie has become the devious ploy whereby to argue one way or another about any difference is to be bound by, held tight in the discursive field, that field which is the lie of beheadings.
And incidentally, on this site, too, there continue to be claims about decapitated Jewish babies. Yet to decline to refute is to allow the lie to increase and multiply while to bother to refute is to be bound by the discourse of the lie so that refuting the beheadings becomes a discourse of the manner of the atrocities but not a refuting of the lie itself and as such about the beheadings. And so it goes.
What was the purpose of this lie?
Civilised decent people do not like babies being hurt, let alone killed.
Shooting babies is one thing (bad enough) but beheading babies would cause righteous anger – supporting whomever wants to get vengeance on the perpetrators.
There is no evidence it is a “lie.”
The White House has walked back Biden’s confirmation. So there’s that.
The lie is on the construct of the discourse.