But it wasn’t. Queensland Police Union boss Ian Leavers is therefore free to speak his mind.
-
Latest Posts
- The Suddenly Orphaned War
- Destined for sculpted immortality, legends do what they do best
- Tingle: Anti-Semitism overblown, Hamas-lovers the real victims
- Conquered
- The Cohen Admonition
- Aussie deep state still getting the hang of rigging a prosecution
- The ABC lionises terrorist cockroach and his depraved mother
-
Recent Comments
-
TCL Archive
- December 2023 (5)
- November 2023 (88)
- October 2023 (100)
- September 2023 (84)
- August 2023 (74)
- July 2023 (89)
- June 2023 (81)
- May 2023 (88)
- April 2023 (90)
- March 2023 (118)
- February 2023 (84)
- January 2023 (101)
- December 2022 (62)
- November 2022 (72)
- October 2022 (83)
- September 2022 (81)
- August 2022 (82)
- July 2022 (83)
- June 2022 (113)
- May 2022 (80)
- April 2022 (114)
- March 2022 (117)
- February 2022 (120)
- January 2022 (126)
- December 2021 (116)
- November 2021 (112)
- October 2021 (126)
- September 2021 (84)
- August 2021 (6)
-
Post Categories
- Art, music, letters
- Australian police state
- Climate hoax
- Culture
- Defence and national security
- Economics and the economy
- Education
- Elections
- Ethics and morality
- Fake conservatism
- Fake news
- Fake science
- Federal politics
- Foreign policy
- General
- History
- International
- Left-wing extremism
- Left-wing hypocrisy
- Legal affairs
- Media
- Politics
- Religion and faith
- Rule of law
- Science and technology
- Social media
- Sport
- State politics
- US politics
- War and peace
- War on Christianity
- Whatever
I think the referendum was held so Labor can placate their allies in the Aboriginal Industrial Complex. The strutted virtuously, cried emotionally in front of the camera, but still the evil racists would not agree. Labor keeps their support but gives away no power.
But the referendum was designed to fail. The establishment, as represented by the MSM said vote No, so those plugged into the MSM said No.
Jannie. I can’t follow your post. I saw hardly anyone in the MSM pushing for NO….outside Sky that is. Can you give a few links, please?
I also saw almost ALL the establishment corporations, sports, associations , professional bodies etc etc relentlessly pushing YES. Saw it on my QANTAS planes. Saw YES everywhere. Where did you see an “establishment” pushing NO?
What, like a fortnight ago when the entire state voted decisively against division by race despite the “divisive rhetoric” by Yes campaigners? Those times?
Mrs Rudd’s Forgettory on steroids.
Bar a few exceptions, such as News Corp and Sky, the establishment overwhelmingly wanted Australians to vote YES.
That article must set some kind of record for the ratio of hostile rebuttals to the original offence, which almost disappears amongst the chatter. The journo’s rolodex must have been melting. And how absurd to talk of preferential justice treatment for aborigines. Next you’ll be telling me Victoria has a separate County Court, for (pasty-faced) indigenes only, where six months is the most you get, no matter what you’ve done. Oh, wait…
Would love to know how distant the Aboriginal relative is that Ms Thomas claims makes her an Aborigine. Strange how many full-bloods like Beth Price voted No and how many freckle-faced ginger-haired people want the gravy train to continue undisturbed.
Believe all experts, unless of course that expert is saying something inconvenient for the current lefty narrative, then demand a resignation.
Ironically, by calling for his resignation, they are proving his point. It is all about putting a thumb on the scale of justice.
This is what struck me most. The ABC’s customary rule of thumb is to muster up two “experts” to faux-rebut any non-leftist statement or personage. Leavers’ observation must have really caused a rage storm because they’ve tripled the pooh-pooh quotient.
Knowing a few Queensland policemen, I had to laugh at the suggestion that the union’s members don’t endorse their rep’s sentiments.
We can now see clearly what the Voicers intended: a communist revolution. And Albanese the revolting Trot was up to his neck in it.
Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo floats a crackdown on social media.
Five days sook leave just wasn’t enough!
Huh?!? Can you give examples? What I remember was the “Yes” campaign all over the MSM, and sponsored by every major corporation. The “No” campaign had almost no funding and was entirely at the grass roots. This result was a complete rejection of the MSM message, and proves that the blubbering heads on TV are treated (correctly) with great suspicion these days.
Totally oblivious to the fact that almost all the actual misinformation came from the yessers, it’s not about treaty, the Uluṟu statement is only 1 page we’re but two of the obvious outright lies that were disproved by the words of 5heir own supporters.
I think Jannie forgot to proof read before posting. I do silly things like that all the time.
Buccy, and others….Mayo is not “oblivious” to anything.
OK, a scamster tradie goes to some old codger’s place and declares that the roof needs immediate repair, and for a paltry $500,000. The old codger replies “but I just had it fully replaced and guaranteed for ten years” The scamster says “That musta been a shonk. Give me the $500,000 and I’ll set it right before it blows off completely in the next gust of wind. Before it kills everyone in the house. Before it kills the neighbours. Before it destroys the entire neighbourhood, and maybe the entire WORLD”. “Ooga F’ing Booga!”
That BS artist Mayo is not oblivious. That BS artist is desperate., That BS artist is unhinged. That BS artist is an hysterical grifter. Etc…
The major F’wits who whipped up the attempted coup (Langton, Pearson, Davis and Mayo), are now in “full retard” mode. They know what the go is: are aware they are losers and knuckleheads. Bye bye Gang of Four!
Would love to know how distant the Aboriginal relative is that Ms Thomas claims makes her an Aborigine.
Ancestry isn’t like mixing paint at Bunnings.
If her Aboriginality is thru the female line, then she has 100% Mitochondrial Aboriginal DNA, which she passes on to her kids as 100%.
People like Stan Grant, Larissa Behrendt, Charles Peerkins kids don’t have descent thru their mother, so it’s 0% Aborigine in their mDNA.
So it’s open season on aboriginal people?
That’s the Narrative being peddled by the MSM.
Since Pearson, Langton, Davis and Mayo are more or less MSM creations, i.e., astroturf, who takes it or bthem seriously?
So what? A few exceptions or outliers does not prove the rule.
Leavers is almost certainly correct in his opinion piece about a potential two tier justice system.
But police are very political these days, and the left has mainly Labor state governments to blame for making them so.
Those on the left (especially the ABC) saying “police have no role in politics” would be the first to express their approval for senior police who came out in support of the Voice, or a treaty.
So, the DNA of only one of the millions of female ancestors we all have, the Aboriginal one, is passed on?
Since it came from Idiot Case we know it is 100% horse hockey.
So, the DNA of only one of the millions of female ancestors we all have, the Aboriginal one, is passed on?
If we have millions of female ancestors and we take a generation to be c. 30 years, then by your reckoning Humans have been on the Earth multiples of 30 Million Years?
Put down the crack pipe, Megan.
If a person hasa a direct Aboriginal ancestor down the Matrilineal line, then they’ve got 100% Aboriginal mitochondrial DNA.
If that person is female, then they can pass that Aboriginal mDNA on.
, and provided they have a daughter, the mDNA can be passed on to another generation, and it will still be 100% mDNA.
Get the picture?
For example, the girl who won Wimbledon a coupla years ago traces her Aboriginal Ancestry thru her father, therefore she doesn’t possess Aboriginal mDNA.
Yep. Absolutely nothing to do with the number of crimes they commit. It’s all the colonialists’ fault.
I think the referendum was held so Labor can placate their allies in the Aboriginal Industrial Complex.
There’s no such thing.
Aborigines don’t vote monolithically, the numbers from Cherbourg and Woorabinda indicate only around 50% turnout for something that was alleged to help them.
The reality is that the Voice Proposal was a massive attempted power grab by [non aboriginal] elites and was voted down on face value.
5,000,000+ votes isn’t a bad result, though, considering there was no detail and Aborigines have already been granted everything they wanted years ago.
So what, mitochondria is a small part of the genome and anyway there is research that suggests this is not absolute anyway. It’s just another distraction from Ed. As is his assertion there is no aboriginal industrial complex, they are the indigenous people that gave credence to in your words,
Ed Case (11.52am). You wrote….
“If we have millions of female ancestors and we take a generation to be c. 30 years, then by your reckoning Humans have been on the Earth multiples of 30 Million Years?
Put down the crack pipe, Megan.”
Usually I refrain from treating mistakes as serious issues (vs deliberate distortions). However, as that was typically nasty leftist BS, I’ll help you out, and I know you’ll thank me….Try not to make yourself look so stupid again….
Going back say 10 generations I have 512 GGGGGGGG Grandmothers. Then 1024 9xG, then 2048 10xG, then 4096 …so you can see that there will be millions of female ancestors in the family very quickly. It reaches the first million at about 23 generations.
Megan may have written it flippantly, or seriously, but in either case she was correct. Try not to be a smartasre when you are so clearly wrong.
Its not me on the crack pipe. Your level of dumb is out beyond Pluto.
You only have to go back 400 years, DickEd, to have 1 million ancestors. Basic genealogy tells us that*. So according your generational reckoning, in 1630, you will have 2 million. Half of them are women. How many female ancestors will you have in 1560?
Answer on the back of an envelope.
*Strangers are just relatives you haven’t met yet, as the saying goes.
Thanks, Mantaray!
1560=1660
Except that for the vast majority of human history (at least until the 20th century), the average lifespan was never more than just over thirty, and the average generation was almost certainly no more than early 20s, if that.
Usually I refrain from treating mistakes as serious issues (vs deliberate distortions). However, as that was typically nasty leftist BS, I’ll help you out, and I know you’ll thank me….Try not to make yourself look so stupid again….
Pompous, much?
Going back say 10 generations I have 512 GGGGGGGG Grandmothers. Then 1024 9xG, then 2048 10xG, then 4096 …so you can see that there will be millions of female ancestors in the family very quickly. It reaches the first million at about 23 generations.
Well, no.
Read my comment again:
The Female Line is: 1. Mother 2. Her mother 3. Her Mother 4. Her mother etc.
So, that line is only 1 woman per generation.
Go back 23 generations, you’re only talking about 23 women, and the amazing thing is that the mDNA of that one woman 23 Gen erations ago is identical to the mDNA of her direct descendants in the female line in the current generation.
Megan may have written it flippantly, or seriously, but in either case she was correct. Try not to be a smartasre when you are so clearly wrong.
I’d say Megan mighta been trying for a Gotcha, failed, and sucked you in too?
Except that for the vast majority of human history (at least until the 20th century), the average lifespan was never more than just over thirty, and the average generation was almost certainly no more than early 20s, if that.
Average lifespan is misleading, being influenced by childhood mortality.
I read that the average lifespan for someone who died in England over the age of 20 in 1840 was no different that the average age of someone who died in 1960 using the same criteria.
As for the span of a Generation, age of Menarche in Germany at the time of JS Bach’s death [1750] was 17 and a half years [because 95+% of people at the time were engaged in farming type outdoor activities].
Given that the definition of a Generation is the midpoint in age between a woman having her first and last child, your assertion
doesn’t hold water.
The average generation of all history prior to the 20th century is nowhere near your assertion of c.30:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.09.07.459333v1.full
Mantaray, I don’t follow the MSM, except the various article picked up by Blogs for analysis.
However I have an elderly relative who faithfully reads the Australian everyday and listens to the ABC and watches the 6 o’clock news.
She believes what the media tells her, be it Donald Trump, Global Warming, or Ukraine. The media told her to vote No. The given reason was because it was a blank cheque, an open ended authority to change to constitution, with no detail on the actual changes. She could not have come to these conclusions herself.
Ed Case there is such a thing, I have seen it with my own eyes and worked within it and next to it. Its in every bureaucracy and corporation, and it operates to support the ALP.
Okay, Jannie.
Keep a lookout for Pink Elephants, they’ve been known to go on the rampage in the bureaucracies and corporations.