On the Panamanian highway shooting of two climate protesters

Occam of razor fame would concur with Matt Walsh on what the tragedy confirms about this era.
This entry was posted in Ethics and morality, Rule of law. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to On the Panamanian highway shooting of two climate protesters

  1. Bruce of Newcastle says:

    He’s been chained to a wall in a Panamanian pesthole.

    That may be justice, but it would’ve saved two live if instead the feral Greens had been chained to the same wall in the same pesthole rather than pissing off motorists for a lie.

  2. C.L. says:

    These ‘protesters’ are not merely pissing people off. As Walsh points out, they are endangering lives; have, in fact, killed at least one person whose ambulance was fatally delayed. Moreover, unlawfully detaining people is not a trivial crime.

  3. Lee says:

    Sad, but perhaps inevitable that vigilantism will happen once police stop enforcing the law because they don’t want to offend or upset the climate/left wing protesters and vandals, who are breaking it.

  4. Ed Case says:

    2 less useful idiots is no loss.
    And there’s plenty more where those 2 came from.
    Dunno about him being chained to a wall though.
    Panama is a fictitious Country owned by Shipping interests, as a lawyer he’s more likely to be kicking back at the Hacienda

  5. cuckoo says:

    So I hear not one but two news services on Melbourne Cup eve, stating matter-of-factly that the traditional Melbourne Cup parade through Melbourne will not be staged because of anti-racing protesters. And no-one seems to think this is a bad thing. When those same idiots stage a road blockade outside Flemington on Cup day, it takes the cops – if the reports I heard were accurate, and I d0 say iftwo hours to move them on. While the Age whines that those cops dared to use pepper spray on some of the protestors! It’s time for a remake of Falling Down and this time the Michael Douglas character needs to win.

    Meanwhile Suella Braverman, in the nominally conservative UK government, dares to point out the bleeding obvious, that cops kid-glove leftist protesters and the pro-Gaza thugs, while going Robocop on anyone from the Right who dares to show up on the street or to publish a non-leftist opinion on social media. And for the crime of stating this patently obvious fact she is now facing expulsion from her portfolio.

  6. Ed Case says:

    Suella Braverman has gone against the Narrative, a sackable offense.
    One might wonder why she would do that, my best guess is that Female Ministers employ similarly clueless female Media Advisers, alternatively male Media Advisers find it too time consuming to get it thru the thick heads of women such as Braverman that while Noticing Odd Stuff is okay, pointing it out isn’t.

  7. Jannie says:

    Ed Case you are a blithering word salad with no object, subject, or predicate. Your stream of consciousness is pointless and misleading. Your prose exudes a kind of juvenile arrogance, which seems to prevent you from learning or developing a coherent argument. Stop writing and start reading.

  8. C.L. says:

    …the nominally conservative UK government…

    Spectrum-wise, it’s pretty much equivalent to the Whitlam government.

    At least Gough deserves respect for pursuing the (silly) things he believed in.

  9. Buccaneer says:

    Ed Case you are a blithering word salad with no object, subject, or predicate. Your stream of consciousness is pointless and misleading. Your prose exudes a kind of juvenile arrogance, which seems to prevent you from learning or developing a coherent argument. Stop writing and start reading.

    If the objective is to provide a counterpoint on this blog, he’s failing badly. If the objective is to provide a nexus that sullies the reputation of this blog and its participants, he’s wildly successful.

  10. Sahul Rex says:

    Jannie says:

    12 November, 2023 at 1:50 am

    Hear Hear

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *