-
Latest Posts
- The Suddenly Orphaned War
- Destined for sculpted immortality, legends do what they do best
- Tingle: Anti-Semitism overblown, Hamas-lovers the real victims
- Conquered
- The Cohen Admonition
- Aussie deep state still getting the hang of rigging a prosecution
- The ABC lionises terrorist cockroach and his depraved mother
-
Recent Comments
-
TCL Archive
- December 2023 (5)
- November 2023 (88)
- October 2023 (100)
- September 2023 (84)
- August 2023 (74)
- July 2023 (89)
- June 2023 (81)
- May 2023 (88)
- April 2023 (90)
- March 2023 (118)
- February 2023 (84)
- January 2023 (101)
- December 2022 (62)
- November 2022 (72)
- October 2022 (83)
- September 2022 (81)
- August 2022 (82)
- July 2022 (83)
- June 2022 (113)
- May 2022 (80)
- April 2022 (114)
- March 2022 (117)
- February 2022 (120)
- January 2022 (126)
- December 2021 (116)
- November 2021 (112)
- October 2021 (126)
- September 2021 (84)
- August 2021 (6)
-
Post Categories
- Art, music, letters
- Australian police state
- Climate hoax
- Culture
- Defence and national security
- Economics and the economy
- Education
- Elections
- Ethics and morality
- Fake conservatism
- Fake news
- Fake science
- Federal politics
- Foreign policy
- General
- History
- International
- Left-wing extremism
- Left-wing hypocrisy
- Legal affairs
- Media
- Politics
- Religion and faith
- Rule of law
- Science and technology
- Social media
- Sport
- State politics
- US politics
- War and peace
- War on Christianity
- Whatever
Press gallery unmoved because Bruce Lehrmann isn’t involved
This entry was posted in Ethics and morality, Federal politics, Legal affairs. Bookmark the permalink.
The High Court ruled him (& others) coldn’t be held in indefinite detention. Fair enough, I suppose.
But why did the government just let these POS just walk free? Who is going to suffer because of this – High Court judges? Not likely. Government ministers? Not likely.
As usual, it will be some poor ordinary person who had nothing to do with this decision.
Justice for ordinary people will soon have to be delivered by those same ordinary people – our governments do not care for us.
I still haven’t seen anything about indefinitely detained Daniel Duggan.
Who has done nothing wrong. Surely the decision covers him too?
I managed to find this decision in full after a bit of digging that mentioned 5 justices at the hearing, no mention of the break up. Was it 5?
Meanwhile, Uncle Albo is off swanning around the world, will we hear from him about Kung Fu Panda again?
Mmm. Good point.
I can’t find that info re majority either, RD.
Saffrine Duggan is indefatigable:
https://twitter.com/FreeDanDuggan/status/1725249455660949543
Researching Judge Jayne Jagot.
Wiki has no birthdate, it’s 1964 or 1965.
Seriously, no birthday, no mention of parents, the High Court makes a decision reflecting ALP policy on Mandatory Detention but totally opposed by real people, is anyone surprised?
We release the absolute scum of the earth, but Duggan remains locked up on trumped-up politically motivated charges by a weak Australian government and AG, at the behest of a thoroughly corrupt Biden government.
what Lee says: 18 November, 2023 at 8:46 pm
The case is NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs & Anor [2023] HCATrans 154 (8 November 2023).
The transcript is on AUUSTLII:
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCATrans/2023/154.html
All 7 judges sat on the hearing. The Chief Justice announced at the end of the hearing that “at least” the majority of the judges agreed with the orders then pronounced.
Whether it is 6-1, 5-2, or 4-3 for the majority is not known yet.
My guess is 6-1.
The result is, in part, a reflection of the poor judicial choices of the Coalition since the Turnbull government, and in particular George Brandis. They failed to appoint conservative to the Court. Now they are reaping the bitter fruits of their choices.
The only conservative judge appointed was Steward J. There is no much he can do on his own.
Thanks, Graham. Much appreciated.
Nor is anyone in our woke media baying for the blood of education department bureaucrats or teachers’ union leaders over this:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-20/queensland-teacher-accused-of-child-exploitation-offences/103125718
Now why am I not surprised?
Thanks Graham. I got my info off Austlii in the end. I gathered there was a shunt left in the court after some of the more recent decisions that seemed to be made by people living in an alter reality.
I still am of the opinion Gageler is underqualified for his position compared to his peers.
That said the Government is appearing to shrug like Atlas (Admittedly expected) and the opposition are just waving arms, not proposing solutions that in the end will have to probably tread on Judicial toes.
The Government is intentionally driving the bus off the road heading into a ditch.
The solution is this Government gets thrown out.
As the ride gets bumpier, more people will arrive at this conclusion.
Maybe they thought that were appointing conservative judges. I’m just not sure they understand what “conservative” means.
Just as, John of Mel, some of the cardinals who voted for Jorge Bergoglio in 2013 thought they were getting a slightly conservative middle-of-the-road type.
Are there any ‘conservatives’ left in the entire Australian judiciary?
Mandatory Detention forever isn’t real conservative, it’s more Reactionary.
Whether there are Commonwealth Departments trying to send these people home, I don’t know but i’d guess there are.
The Stateless Rohingya who raped a ten year old boy in Australia should’ve faced the Death Penalty.
Now, some say the Death Penalty doesn’t deter, and I’d agree, since many viol;ent criminals are Psychopaths.
But, deterrence isn’t the aim.
The aim is to remove these people from the society permanently.
I agree with what Ed Case says: 21 November, 2023 at 8:04 pm