No quarter will be given to these child groomers and mutilators

Today we celebrate with Matt Walsh but, as MLK once said, “we’ve got some difficult days ahead.”
This entry was posted in Ethics and morality, Left-wing extremism. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to No quarter will be given to these child groomers and mutilators

  1. C.L. says:

    This phenomenon is orchestrated and has a goal…

    https://twitter.com/JoelWBerry/status/1630637168782655488

    All adults present and cheering should be jailed.

  2. Lee says:

    Disgusting and evil.

  3. Cassie of Sydney says:

    Thank you Matt Walsh. I admire Matt Walsh enormously. Last week Matt Walsh called out that all round pervert and freak, Dylan Mulvaney, for what HE truly is. Once upon a time Mulvaney and HIS ilk belonged in a mental asylum or in a circus. Yes, that’s blunt but read my words, I DON’T CARE WHAT YOU THINK. I find the likes of Mulvaney utterly offensive. No amount of make up, no amount of facial and body surgery, no fishnet stockings, no lipstick, no high heels that he can barely walk in, no pouting of his lips and flicking of his hair will ever make Dylan Mulvaney a woman. Yet this freak was given a personal audience by the old Sniffer in the White House. As I wrote yesterday, ya reckon Putin would have given this sinister freak an audience…….NYET.

    For Walsh’s efforts last week, he was called by some on the right a “meanie”. Yep folks, that’s the world we’re living in. To this, Walsh says…..

    “Stop Sacrificing Truth On The Altar Of Nice”

    Thank you Mr Walsh. But it raises a question, and I wrote about in yesterday’s Cat. Rather than posting it here, I’ll link to it.

    https://newcatallaxy.blog/2023/02/28/open-thread-tue-28-feb-2023/comment-page-3/#comments

    You want to know what really bothers and angers me? It’s the cowards on the right or centre-right who side with the perverts and the progressives because they’re too scared of being called names.

    I think it’s high time that people remember that old adage, “sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me”.

  4. Cassie of Sydney says:

    When you press the link, my comment is at 7.35 a.m. (it was yesterday morning).

  5. Gab says:

    Speaking of child groomers and mutilators … unsurprisingly, the Archdiocese of Melbourne says nothing.

    The Archdiocese of Melbourne is allowing a transgender teacher to teach at a Catholic school. Another damning reminder of the utter failings of the church in Australia when a stance needs to be made. The fact that parents aren’t up-in-arms speaks volumes to the level of catechesis going on in the schools.
    Starts with one, there’ll be more and it won’t be surprising to see a cluster of students wanting to transition after this.

  6. Riversutra says:

    The gay men behind the girl and the way they laugh and leer, you get a real sense of their absolute joy in watching the perversion of a child.
    As for the mother dancing with joy to see her little one objectified, well with that type it’s always “look at me, I’m so progressive, just admire meeeee” .
    Bring on the End Times, oh wait, they’re here already, well bring ’em on faster.

  7. C.L. says:

    Meanwhile, a Canadian inquiry will recommend that “mature minors” be allowed to choose “voluntary assisted suicide.”

    Mature minors. You can see where the left is going with that idea, can’t you?

    If they’re mature enough to “transition,” mature enough for sex cabarets and mature enough to choose death, guess what else they’ll soon be adjudged “mature” enough for. That’s why the “men behind the girl” are thrilled.

  8. twostix says:

    Mature minors. You can see where the left is going with that idea, can’t you?

    They already exercised this during the vaccine wars. Explained that children could make their own decision to get vaccinated at school, if the agent of the state sitting in front of them pressuring them to get it, themselves decided that the child was mature enough to make the “decision”.

    It’s flowing everywhere, at 13 parents get kicked out of their kids bank accounts and have to be approved by the child, google kicks you out of your kids accounts, etc, etc.

    At every level they’re working really, really hard to get to your children without you being in the road.

  9. Lee says:

    If they’re mature enough to “transition,” mature enough for sex cabarets and mature enough to choose death, guess what else they’ll soon be adjudged “mature” enough for. That’s why the “men behind the girl” are thrilled.

    Is this a hill the “progressive” left is prepared to die on?

    And would the rest of society finally so say “no” to them in utter revulsion, or not?

  10. Cassie of Sydney says:

    In her book Irreversible Damage, The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters, US author Abigail Shrier notes how most of the parents of the girls “transitioning” are white, affluent “progressives” or in American parlance, “liberals”.

    It is indisputable that some mothers and fathers, but particularly mothers, put their children at risk. Sometimes this is accidental and sometimes it is quite deliberate and malicious. Some parents do so because they are naive, some parents do so because of stupidity and some parents are actually happy to endanger their children to risk. They fail to understand or to connect how certain people, certain lifestyles and certain practices endanger children psychologically and physically. Examples of this happen almost every week, where a child had died or been murdered due to parental negligence and often this negligence is deliberate. Often it is a mother’s de facto or boyfriend. I remember reading a story about a young child who went missing decades ago. Whilst it took decades to unravel, the child’s pedophile abductor had been known to the mother. The mother had associated with some very unsavoury people. Of course, she didn’t set out to deliberately endanger her child, but there are consequences when you hang around dangerous people and you leave your child in the care of people who should not be near children.

    The sudden emergence of children attending drag queen shows as well as having male drag queens read stories to children is a phenomenon that would disappear tomorrow if parents, and again particularly mothers, stopped taking their children to such shows. But you see, these parents are so indoctrinated into a progressive world view that refuses to acknowledge that some people and some practices are sinister, perverse and downright evil and by taking their children along, they are exposing their children to outright danger.

    None of this will end well.

  11. C.L. says:

    It is indisputable that some mothers and fathers, but particularly mothers, put their children at risk.

    I’ve noticed over and over again that there is no father in those TikTok editorials by the mums of trans ‘girls’. IMO, they are castrating their sons as revenge against a specific man – or manhood generally. They are deeply, criminally deranged.

    The mother had associated with some very unsavoury people. Of course, she didn’t set out to deliberately endanger her child, but there are consequences when you hang around dangerous people…

    In the case of Dorothy Hewett, she willingly gave her daughters to Labor hero and rapist Bob Ellis and his left-wing mates.

  12. Franx says:

    The trans child is forever depicted as looking the part and living the sexualised life of the Disney-Hollywood dream underpinned by an ideology positing the deformed trans status as something superior, maybe even to the extent of the ubermensch.

    Pressure to some extent, then, on all children to follow suit or to risk being left behind as the dregs.

    Something similar occurred with the sexual revolution where to not follow suit was to be dismissed as being oppressed. But only if you did not get pregnant, or if you were not actually caught to be cheating or something similar, for then the opprobriums of the nice people came into play. Just as I don’t suppose that trans children who have any problems at all in the future will be treated with compassion. More likely referred to doctor death.

  13. C.L. says:

    Great point, Franx. Definitely reflected in the figures.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *